Исследование действием как способ трансформации представлений педагогов о применении цифровых сервисов на уроке
Аннотация
Учителя трех общеобразовательных школ участвовали в проекте, целью которого было оценить возможности исследования действием — «изучения, как что-то делать, делая это» — как способа изменить их представления и профессиональные практики. После продолжительного курса обучения учителя самостоятельно проектировали и проводили уроки по своему предмету с использованием цифровых инструментов для стимулирования активного учения. В ходе этой работы они получали постоянную поддержку наставника — автора статьи, а также проходили входное, промежуточные и итоговое интервью. Эти интервью дали возможность проследить, как меняется отношение учителя к цифровым инструментам, как он воспринимает деятельность учащихся в условиях применения этих инструментов, как оценивает собственную работу по проектированию и проведению урока. Установлено, что представления учителей трансформируются таким образом, что предпочтительной формой организации урока становится обучение, центрированное на ученике. Учителя отметили, что самостоятельно проведенное ими исследование на собственном классе помогло им принять предлагаемые инструменты и формы работы. Изменилось отношение учителей к цифровым сервисам: они стали рассматриваться как инструмент не только для себя, но и для учеников. Новые способы применения цифровых инструментов изменили характер урока, спровоцировали переход от фронтального обучения к активным формам работы. При этом работа с цифровым инструментом стала для учителей более осознанной и осмысленной.
Скачивания
Литература
Avdeenko N.A. (2021) Predstavleniya uchiteley o kreativnosti i eyo razvitii v shkole [Teachers’ Beliefs about Creativity and Its Nurture at School]. The Journal of Education and Self Development, vol. 16, no 2, pp. 124–138. https://doi.org/10.26907/esd.16.2.08
Atweh B., Kemmis S., Weeks P. (eds) (2002) Action Research in Practice: Partnership for Social Justice in Education. London; New York: Routledge.
Biesta G., Priestley M., Robinson S. (2015) The Role of Beliefs in Teacher Agency. Teachers and Teaching, vol. 21, no 6, pp. 624–640. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2015.1044325
Coghlan D., Brannick T. (2005) Doing Action Research in Your Own Organization. London; Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Cuban L. (2003) Oversold and Underused: Computers in the Classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvk12qnw
Devine J., Punie Y., Kampylis P. (2015) Promoting Effective Digital-Age Learning: A European Framework for Digitally-Competent Educational Organisations. https://doi.org/10.2791/54070
Donnelly D., McGarr O., O’Reilly J. (2011) A Framework for Teachers’ Integration of ICT into Their Classroom Practice. Computers & Education, vol. 57, no 2, pp. 1469–1483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.02.014
Dvoretskaya I.V. (2021) Model' digcomporg i eyo znachenie dlya razrabotki mnogoaspektnoy protsessnoy modeli tsifrovogo obnovleniya shkoly [Digcomporg for Developing a Multi-Aspect Model of Schools' Digital Renewal Process]. Proceedings of the IV International Scientific Conference "Informatization of Education and e-Learning Methodology: Digital Technologies in Education" (Krasnoyarsk, 2020, October 6–9), in 2 parts, part 2, pp. 484–487.
Freire P. (1982) Creating Alternative Research Methods. Learning to Do It by Doing It. Creating Knowledge: A Monopoly (eds B. Hall, A. Gillette, R. Tandon), New Delhi: Society for Participatory Research in Asia, pp. 29–37.
Jay J.K., Johnson K.L. (2002) Capturing Complexity: A Typology of Reflective Practice for Teacher Education. Teaching and Teacher Education, vol. 18, no 1, pp. 73–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0742-051x(01)00051-8
Kemmis S., McTaggart R., Nixon R. (2014) The Action Research Planner: Doing Critical Participatory Action Research. Singapore, Heidelberg, New York, Dordrecht, London: Springer Science & Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4560-67-2
Kirkpatrick D.L., Kirkpatrick J.D. (2006) Evaluating Training Programs: The Four Levels. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.
Klassen R.M., Tze V.M. (2014) Teachers’ Self-Efficacy, Personality, and Teaching Effectiveness: A Meta-Analysis. Educational Research Review, vol. 12, June, pp. 59–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2014.06.001
Koehler M.J., Mishra P. (2005) Teachers Learning Technology by Design. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, vol. 21, no 3, pp. 94–102.
Kolb D.A. (2014) Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. New Jersey: FT.
Levin T., Nevo Y. (2009) Exploring Teachers’ Views on Learning and Teaching in the Context of a Trans‐Disciplinary Curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies, vol. 41, no 4, pp. 439–465. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220270802210453
Lewin K. (1997) Conduct, Knowledge and the Acceptance of New Values. Resolving Social Conflicts: Selected Papers on Group Dynamics (ed. G. Lewin), Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, pp. 48–55.
Lewin K. (1947) Frontiers in Group Dynamics: Concept, Method and Reality in Social Science; Social Equilibria and Social Change. Human Relations, vol. 1, no 1, pp. 5–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872674700100103
Luckin R., Bligh B., Manches A., Ainsworth S., Crook C., Noss R. (2012) Decoding Learning: The Proof, Promise and Potential of Digital Education. London: Nesta.
Michael J.A., Modell H.I. (2003) Active Learning in Secondary and College Science Classrooms: A Working Model for Helping the Learner to Learn. New York, NY: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410609212
Mikhailova A.M. (2021) Razvitie kriticheskogo i kreativnogo myshleniya na urokakh s ispolʼzovaniem IKT: teoreticheskie osnovaniya i prakticheskie primery [Fostering Creativity and Critical Thinking with the Use of ICT: Theoretical Foundations and Empirical Examples]. Informatics and Education, no 6, pp. 43–50. https://doi.org/10.32517/0234-0453-2021-36-6-43-50
Mochizuki Y., Santillan-Rosas I.M., Gudino S., Hazard R. (2019) Rethinking Pedagogy: Exploring the Potential of Digital Technology in Achieving Quality Education. New Delhi: UNESCO, MGIEP.
Murata A. (2010) Teacher Learning with Lesson Study. International Encyclopedia of Education (eds P. Peterson, E. Baker, B. McGaw), Elsevier, pp. 575–581. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-08-044894-7.00659-x
Opre D. (2022) Teachers’ Pedagogical Beliefs and Technology Integration. Proceedings of 9th International Conference "Education, Reflection, Development" (ERD 2021) (Cluj-Napoca, Romania, 2021, 25 June), vol. 2, pp. 112–118. https://doi.org/10.15405/epes.22032.10
Orlov A.B. (1981) Osnovnye issledovatel'skie metody vozrastnoy i pedagogicheskoy psikhologii [Basic Research Methods of Age and Pedagogical Psychology]. Voprosy psychologii, no 1, pp. 147–155.
Pinskaya M.A., Mikhailova A.M. (2019) Kompetentsii «4K»: formirovanie i otsenka na uroke. Prakticheskie rekomendatsii ["4K" Competencies: Formation and Assessment in the Lesson. Practical Recommendations]. Moscow: Rossijskiy uchebnik.
Ponte P. (2010) Action Research as a Tool for Teachers’ Professional Development. International Encyclopedia of Education (eds P. Peterson, E. Baker, B. McGaw), Elsevier, pp. 540–547. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-08-044894-7.00658-8
Reason P., Bradbury H. (eds) (2013) The SAGE Handbook of Action Research: Participative Inquiry and Practice. London; Thousand Oaks, CA; New Delhi; Singapore: Sage.
Richards J.C., Gallo P.B., Renandya W.A. (2001) Exploring Teachers’ Beliefs and the Processes of Change. PAC journal, vol. 1, no 1, pp. 41–58.
Saroyan A. (2022) Fostering Creativity and Critical Thinking in University Teaching and Learning: Considerations for Academics and Their Professional Learning. OECD Education Working Papers no 280. Paris: OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/09b1cb3b-en
Sato M., Rogers C. (2010) Case Methods in Teacher Education. International Encyclopedia of Education (eds P. Peterson, E. Baker, B. McGaw), Elsevier, pp. 592–597. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-08-044894-7.00662-x
Smith C., Gillespie M. (2007) Research on Professional Development and Teacher Change: Implications for Adult Basic Education. Review of Adult Learning and Literacy, vol. 7, no 7, pp. 205–244. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003417996-7
Stes A., Min-Leliveld M., Gijbels D., Van Petegem P. (2010) The Impact of Instructional Development in Higher Education: The State-of-the-Art of the Research. Educational Research Review, vol. 5, no 1, pp. 25–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2009.07.001
Thompson A.G. (2019) Teachers' Beliefs and Conceptions: A Synthesis of the Research. Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning: A Project of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (ed. D. A. Grouws), New York, NY: Macmillan, pp. 127–146.
Tondeur J., Van Braak J., Ertmer P.A., Ottenbreit-Leftwich A. (2016) Understanding the Relationship between Teachers’ Pedagogical Beliefs and Technology Use in Education: A Systematic Review of Qualitative Evidence. Educational Technology Research and Development, vol. 65, no 3, pp. 555–575. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9481-2
Uvarov A.YU. (2022) O defitsitakh issledovaniy i razrabotok dlya tsifrovoy transformatsii otechestvennoy shkoly [On the Deficits of Research and Development for the Digital Transformation of the National School]. Proceedings of the VI International Scientific Conference "Informatization of Education and e-Learning Methods: Digital Technologies in Education" (Krasnoyarsk, 2022, September, 20–23), part 2, pp. 343–348.
Uvarov A.Yu. (2018) Tsifrovaya transformatsiya ucheniya i obucheniya [Digital Transformation of Teaching and Learning]. Proceedings of the International Conference "Modern Education: Vectors of Development. Digitalization of the Economy and Society: Challenges for the Education System (Moscow, 2018, 24–25 April), pp. 189–228.
Van Zoest L., Bohl J. (2005) Mathematics Teacher Identity: A Framework for Understanding Secondary School Mathematics Teachers’ Learning through Practice. Teacher Development, vol. 9, no 3, pp. 315–346. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530500p200271
Uvarov A.Yu., Vikhrev V.V., Vodopian G.M., Dvoretskaya I.V., Coceak E., Levin I. (2021) Shkoly v razvivayushchejsya tsifrovoy srede: tsifrovoe obnovlenie i ego zrelost' [Schools in a Evolving Digital Environment: Digital Renewal and Its Maturity]. Informatics and Education, no 7, pp. 5–28. https://doi.org/10.32517/0234-0453-2021-36-7-5-28
Vincent-Lancrin S., González-Sancho C., Bouckaert M., de Luca F., Fernández-Barrerra M., Jacotin G., Urgel J., Vidal Q. (2019) Fostering Students' Creativity and Critical Thinking: What It Means in School. Educational Research and Innovation. Paris: OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/62212c37-en
Wegerif R. (2002) Literature Review in Thinking Skills, Technology and Learning. Futurelab report no 2. Available at: https://www.uio.no/studier/emner/matnat/ifi/nedlagte-emner/TOOL5100/v08/leseliste/F6/Wegerif-2002.pdf (accessed 20 January 2024).
World Economic Forum (2022). Catalysing Education 4.0. Investing in the Future of Learning for a Human-Centric Recovery. Insight Report. Available at: https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Catalysing_Education_4.0_2022.pdf (accessed 2 June 2024).
Zagvyazinskiy, V.I., Atakhanov R. (2005) Metodologiya i metody psikhologo-pedagogicheskogo issledovaniya [Methodology and Methods of Psychological and Pedagogical Research]. Moscow: Academy.
