Publish or Perish в российских социальных науках: паттерны соавторства в «хищных» и «чистых» журналах
Аннотация
Количественные способы оценивания научных результатов могут привести к использованию исследователями публикационных практик, нарушающих академическую этику. В статье рассматривается одна из таких практик — фиктивное соавторство, которое стало распространенным способом наращивания количества публикаций. Авторы сравнивают паттерны соавторства в «чистых» и «хищных» журналах, публикующих исследования в области социальных наук: доли статей, написанных единственным автором и в соавторстве, типы соавторств, географическое распределение авторов и число авторов на статью. Выявлены значимые различия между двумя корпусами публикаций: в «хищных» журналах больше доля статей, опубликованных в соавторстве, причем если в первые годы публикационного давления такие статьи в основном размещали команды сотрудников одного университета, то затем все чаще стали появляться статьи, авторы которых работают в разных университетах. Значимая доля таких статей публикуется командами из пяти и больше авторов, что почти не встречается в «чистых» журналах. Такие соавторства расцениваются как свидетельство перехода авторов от самостоятельного поиска «хищного» журнала к покупке авторского места в уже готовой публикации.
Скачивания
Литература
Abalkina A. (2022) Publication and Collaboration Anomalies in Academic Papers Originating from a Paper Mill: Evidence from a Russia-based Paper Mill. https://arxiv.org/abs/2112.13322
Akoev M.A., Markusova V.A., Moskaleva O.V., Pislyakov V.V. (2021) Rukovodstvo po naukometrii: indikatory razvitiya nauki i tekhnologii [Scientometric Handbook: Indicators of the Development of Science and Technology]. Yekaterinburg: Ural University.
Bagues M., Sylos-Labini M., Zinovyeva N. (2019) A Walk on the Wild Side: ‘Predatory’ Journals and Information Asymmetries in Scientific Evaluations. Research Policy, vol. 48, no 2, pp. 462–477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.04.013
Beigel F., Omobowale A., Akanle O., Adeniran A., Adegboyega K. (2014) Peripheral Scholarship and the Context of Foreign Paid Publishing in Nigeria. Current Sociology, vol. 62, no 5, pp. 666–684. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392113508127
Broz L., Stöckelová T. (2018) The Culture of Orphaned Texts: Academic Books in a Performance-Based Evaluation System. Aslib Journal of Information Management, vol. 70, no 6, pp. 623–642. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-03-2018-0063
Dalen H.P. van, Henkens K. (2012) Intended and Unintended Consequences of a Publish-Or-Perish Culture: A Worldwide Survey. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, vol. 63, no 7, pp. 1282–1293. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1983205
Dell'Anno R., Caferra R., Morone A. (2020) A “Trojan Horse” in the Peer-Review Process of Fee-Charging Economic Journals. Journal of Informetrics, vol. 14, no 3, Article no 101052. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2020.101052
Fong E.A., Wilhite A.W. (2017) Authorship and Citation Manipulation in Academic Research. PloS one, vol. 12, no 12, Article no e0187394. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0187394
Frandsen T.F. (2019) Why Do Researchers Decide to Publish in Questionable Journals? A Review of the Literature. Learned Publishing, vol. 32, no 1, pp. 57–62. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1214
Guba K.S. (2022) Naukometricheskie pokazateli v otsenke rossijskikh universitetov: obzor issledovaniy [Scientometric Indicators in the Evaluation of Russian Universities: A Literature Review]. Universe of Russia, no 1, pp. 49–73. https://doi.org/10.17323/1811-038X-2022-31-1-49-73
Gureyev V., Lakizo I., Mazov N. (2019) Unethical Authorship in Scientific Publications (A Review of the Problem). Scientific and Technical Information Processing, vol. 46, no 4, pp. 219–232. https://doi.org/10.3103/S0147688219040026
Guskov A.E. (2015) Rossijskaya naukometriya: obzor issledovaniy [Russian Scientometrics: A Review of Researches]. Bibliosphere, no 3, pp. 75–86.
Guskov A.E., Kosyakov D.V. (2020) Natsional'ny fraktsionny schyot i otsenka nauchnoy rezul'tativnosti organizatsiy [National Fractional Calculations and Evaluating Organization's Science Efficiency]. Nauchnye I Tekhnicheskie Biblioteki / Scientific and Technical Libraries, no 1, pp. 15–42. https://doi.org/10.33186/1027-3689-2020-9-15-42
Guskov A.E., Kosyakov D.V. Selivanova I.V. (2018) Boosting Research Productivity in Top Russian Universities: The Circumstances of Breakthrough. Scientometrics, vol. 117, no 6, pp. 1053–1080. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2890-8
Henriksen D. (2016) The Rise in Co-Authorship in the Social Sciences (1980–2013). Scientometrics, vol. 107, no 2, pp. 455–476. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-1849-x
Hicks D. (2013) One Size Doesn’t Fit All: On the Co-Evolution of National Evaluation Systems and Social Science Publishing. Confero: Essays on Education, Philosophy and Politics, vol. 1, no 1, pp. 67–90. https://doi.org/10.3384/confero13v1121207b
Koch T., Vanderstraeten R. (2019) Internationalizing a National Scientific Community? Changes in Publication and Citation Practices in Chile, 1976–2015. Current Sociology, vol. 67, no 5, pp. 723–741. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392118807514
Krawczyk F., Kulczycki E. (2021) How Is Open Access Accused of Being Predatory? The Impact of Beall's Lists of Predatory Journals on Academic Publishing. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, vol. 47, no 2, Article no 102271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2020.102271
Kulczycki E., Hołowiecki M., Taşkın Z., Krawczyk F. (2021) Citation Patterns between Impact-Factor and Questionable Journals. Scientometrics, vol. 126, no 10, pp. 8541–8560. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04121-8
Kurt S. (2018) Why Do Authors Publish in Predatory Journals? Learned Publishing, vol. 31, no 2, pp. 141–147. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1150
Kuzminov Ya.I., Yudkevich M.M. (2021) Universitety v Rossii: kak eto rabotaet [Russian Universities: How the System Works]. Moscow: HSE Publishing House. . https://doi.org/10.17323/978-5-7598-2373-5
Liebowitz S.R. (2014) Willful Blindness: The Inefficient Reward Structure in Academic Research. Economic Inquiry, vol. 52, no 4, pp. 1267–1283. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2214207
Marina T., Sterligov I. (2021) Prevalence of Potentially Predatory Publishing in Scopus on the Country Level. Scientometrics, vol. 126, no 1, pp. 5019–5077. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-03899-x
Matumba L., Maulidi F., Balehegn M., Abay F., Salanje G., Dzimbiri L., Kaunda E. (2019) Blacklisting or Whitelisting? Deterring Faculty in Developing Countries from Publishing in Substandard Journals. Journal of Scholarly Publishing, vol. 50, no 2, pp. 83–95. https://doi.org/10.3138/jsp.50.2.01
Matveeva N.N. (2020) Bibliometricheskiy analiz vzaimodejstviya uchyonykh v rossijskikh vuzakh: kooperatsiya vs individual'naya produktivnost' [Bibliometric Analysis of Scientific Collaboration in Russian Universities: Cooperation vs Individual Productivity]. University Management: Practice and Analysis, vol. 24, no 2, pp. 26–43. https://doi.org/10.15826/umpa.2020.02.012
Matveeva N., Ferligoj A. (2020) Scientific Collaboration in Russian Universities before and after the Excellence Initiative Project ˮ5-100ˮ. Scientometrics, vol.124, no 2, pp. 2383–2407. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03602-6
Matveeva N., Sterligov I., Yudkevich M. (2021) The Effect of Russian University Excellence Initiative on Publications and Collaboration Patterns. Journal of Informetrics, vol. 15, no 1, Article no 101110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2020.101110
Moed H.F., Markusova V., Akoev M. (2018) Trends in Russian Research Output Indexed in Scopus and Web of Science. Scientometrics, vol. 116, no 7, pp. 1153–1180. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2769-8
Mokhnacheva Y.V., Kharybina T.N. (2011) Nauchnaya produktivnost' uchrezhdeniy RAN i vuzov: sravnitel'ny bibliometricheskiy analiz [Research Performance of RAS Institutions and Russian Universities: A Comparative Bibliometric Analysis]. Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences, vol. 81, no 12, pp. 1065–1070.
Mosbah-Natanson S., Gingras Y. (2014) The Globalization of Social Sciences? Evidence from a Quantitative Analysis of 30 Years of Production, Collaboration and Citations in the Social Sciences (1980–2009). Current Sociology, vol. 62, no 5, pp. 626–646. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392113498866
Pyne D. (2017) The Rewards of Predatory Publications at a Small Business School. Journal of Scholarly Publishing, vol. 48, no 3, pp. 137–160. https://doi.org/10.3138/jsp.48.3.137
RAS Commission on Combating Falsification of Scientific Research (2020) Inostrannye khishchnye zhurnaly v Scopus i WoS: perevodnoy plagiat i rossijskie nedobrosovestnye avtory [Foreign Predatory Journals in Scopus and WoS: Translated Plagiarism and Russian Unscrupulous Authors]. Available at: https://kpfran.ru/wp-content/uploads/plagiarism-by-translation-2.pdf (accessed 20 October 2022).
Resnik D.B., Tyler A.M., Black J.R., Kissling G. (2016) Authorship Policies of Scientific Journals. Journal of Medical Ethics, vol. 42, no 3, pp. 199–202. https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2015-103171
Rijcke S.D., Wouters P.F., Rushforth A.D., Franssen T.P., Hammarfelt B. (2016) Evaluation Practices and Effects of Indicator Use—a Literature Review. Research Evaluation, vol. 25, no 2, Article no rvv038. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvv038
Semyonov D. (2014) Russian Excellence Initiative in the Post-Soviet Context. Higher Education in Russia and Beyond, no 1, pp. 15–17.
Shibanova E.Yu., Platonova D.P., Lisyutkin M.A. (2018) Proekt ˮ5-100ˮ: dinamika i pattern razvitiya universitetov [Project ˮ5-100ˮ: Dynamics and Development Patterns of Universities]. University Management: Practice and Analysis, vol. 22, no 3, pp. 32–48. https://doi.org/10.15826/umpa.2018.03.025
Turko T., Bakhturin G., Bagan V., Poloskov S., Gudym D. (2016) Influence of the Program ‘‘5-top 100’’ on the Publication Activity of Russian Universities. Scientometrics, vol. 109, no 2, pp. 769–782. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2060-9
Vȋiu G., Păunescu M. (2021) The Lack of Meaningful Boundary Differences between Journal Impact Factor Quartiles Undermines their Independent Use in Research Evaluation. Scientometrics, vol. 126, no 2, pp.1495–1525. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03801-1
Wallace F.H., Perri T.J. (2018) Economists Behaving Badly: Publications in Predatory Journals. Scientometrics, vol. 115, no 2, pp. 749–766. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2690-1
Wuchty S., Jones B., Uzzi B. (2007) The Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge. Science, vol. 316, no 5827, pp. 1036–1039. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1136099
Wu L., Wang D., Evans J. (2019) Large Teams Develop and Small Teams Disrupt Science and Technology. Nature, vol. 566, no 7744, pp. 378–382. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-0941-9
Xia J., Harmon J.L., Connolly K.G., Donnelly R.M., Anderson M.R., Howard H.A. (2015) Who Publishes in “Predatory” Journals? Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, vol. 66, no 7, pp. 1406–1417. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23265
Copyright (c) 2022 Авторы сохраняют за собой авторское право и принимают условия публикации в журнале (https://vo.hse.ru/copyright)
Это произведение доступно по лицензии Creative Commons «Attribution-NonCommercial» («Атрибуция — Некоммерческое использование») 4.0 Всемирная.
