From Behaviorism to Neoconstructivism: A Review of Educational Theories for the Development of Independence in the Conditions of Destruction
Abstract
An increasing number of cases have revealed that previously stable systems have shown attitudes towards unstable ones, not only generating risks, but also showing opportunities for manifestation in the manifestation of new communities and manifestations of action. There is a growing demand for agency, as an independent existence of the totality. In order to determine how adequately the institution responds to this demand today (and may be likely in the future) of the key human development, the formal education system, it is important to take into account key educational theories that take into account the logic of the development of an initiative in the field of education. This article provides a review and analysis of the capture and recognized classical educational theories (learning theory) of behaviorism, cognitivism and constructivism regarding their opposites for solving the problems of developing abilities for independent creative action (agency). The outcomes that are most relevant to the development of agency are constructivist theory, in which the learner is given an active role in the exploration of outcomes. But this theory also has significant requirements, since the focus is on learning cognitive abilities - knowledge and feelings that reproduce the flesh of the flesh given from the outside, and not the ability to develop an independent creative action that maintains and improves the social world (including the creation of communities or institutions). The authors attempted to formulate possible grounds for a new educational theory - neo-construction, which emphasizes the ability for independent creative action as a key educational result, and also takes into account a number of achievements of cognitivism and behaviorism, which are influenced by the interpretations of constructivism.
Downloads
References
Alanazi A. (2016) A Critical Review of Constructivist Theory and the Emergence of Constructionism. American Research Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, vol. 2, pp. 1–8.
Archer M. (2003) Structure, Agency and the Internal Conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University.
Bandura A. (2006) Toward a Psychology of Human Agency. Perspectives on Psychological Science, vol. 1, no 2, pp. 164–180. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00011.x
Bandura A. (1999) Social Cognitive Theory of Personality. Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research (eds L.A. Pervin, O.P. John), New York, NY: Guilford, pp. 154–196.
Baum W.M. (2020) Understanding Behaviorism. Moscow: Praktika (In Russian).
Beetham D. (1997) Bureaucracy. Sotsiologicheskiy zhurnal / Sociological Journal, no 4, pp. 165–185 (In Russian).
Bell R., Bell H. (2020) Applying Educational Theory to Develop a Framework to Support the Delivery of Experiential Entrepreneurship Education. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, vol. 27, no 6, pp. 987–1004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JSBED-01-2020-0012
Bennett R. (2006) Business Lecturers' Perceptions of the Nature of Entrepreneurship. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior and Research, vol. 12, no 3, pp. 165–188. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/13552550610667440
Berger P., Luckmann T. (1995) The Social Construction of Reality. A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. Moscow: Medium (In Russian).
Boekaerts M., Cascallar E. (2006) How Far Have We Moved toward the Integration of Theory and Practice in Self-Regulation? Educational Psychology Review, vol. 18, no 3, pp. 199–210. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10648-006-9013-4
Brodie K. (2014) Learning about Learner Errors in Professional Learning Communities. Educational Studies in Mathematics, vol. 85, no 2, pp. 221–239. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10649-013-9507-1
Brushlinskiy A.V. (ed.) (2022) Psychological Science in Russia of the XX Century: Problems of Theory and History. Moscow: Litres (In Russian).
Davydov V.V., Slobodchikov V.I., Tsukerman G.A. (2003) The Elementary School Student as an Agent of Learning Activity. Journal of Russian & East European Psychology, vol. 41, no 5, pp. 63–76. https://doi.org/10.2753/RPO1061-0405410563
Driscoll M.P. (2013) Psychology of Learning for Instruction. Harlow: Pearson.
Efklides A. (2011) Interactions of Metacognition with Motivation and Affect in Self-Regulated Learning: The MASRL Model. Educational Psychologist, vol. 46, no 1, pp. 6–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2011.538645
Fenwick T.J. (2003) Learning through Experience: Troubling Orthodoxies and Intersecting Questions. Malabar, FL: Krieger.
Giddens A. (1984) The Constitution of Society. Berkeley: University of California.
Hamouda A.M.S., Tarlochan F. (2015) Engaging Engineering Students in Active Learning and Critical Thinking through Class Debates. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 191, pp. 990–995. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.379
Hennessey M.G. (1999) Probing the Dimensions of Metacognition: Implications for Conceptual Change Teaching-Learning. Washington, DC: Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse.
Jenkins A., Healey M. (2012) Research-Led or Research-Based Undergraduate Curricula. University Teaching in Focus (eds L. Hunt, D. Chalmers), London: Routledge, pp. 128–144.
Jonassen D.H. (1991) Evaluating Constructivistic Learning. Educational Technology, vol. 31, no 9, pp. 28–33.
Kek M.Y.C.A., Huijser H. (2011) The Power of Problem‐Based Learning in Developing Critical Thinking Skills: Preparing Students for Tomorrow’s Digital Futures in Today’s Classrooms. Higher Education Research & Development, vol. 30, no 3, pp. 329–341. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2010.501074
Klepsch M., Seufert T. (2020) Understanding Instructional Design Effects by Differentiated Measurement of Intrinsic, Extraneous, and Germane Cognitive Load. Instructional Science, vol. 48, no 1, pp. 45–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-020-09502-9
Koreshnikova Yu.N., Frоumin I.D. (2020) Teachers’ Professional Skills as a Factor in the Development of Students’ Critical Thinking. Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie / Psychological Science and Education, vol. 25, no 6, pp. 88–103 (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.17759/pse.2020250608
Lekalakala-Mokgele E. (2010) Facilitation in Problem-Based Learning: Experiencing the Locus of Control. Nurse Education Today, vol. 30, no 7, pp. 638–642. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2009.12.017
Lobok A.M. (2017) Probabilistic Pedagogy of a Dialogue: Theory and Practice. Volga Region Pedagogical Search, no 2, pp. 30–39 (In Russian).
McInerney D.M. (2013) Educational Psychology: Constructing Learning, Sydney: Pearson Australia.
Mironenko I.A., Sorokin P.S. (2022) Activity Theory for the De-Structuralized Modernity. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, vol. 56, no 4, pp. 1055–1071. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12124-020-09587-4
OECD (2018) The Future of Education and Skills: Education 2030. Paris: OECD.
Pintrich P.R., Wolters C.A., Baxter G.P. (2000) Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulated Learning. Issues in the Measurement of Metacognition (eds G. Schraw, J. Impara), Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska, pp. 43–97.
Rubinstein S.L. (1940) Fundamentals of General Psychology. Saint-Petrsburg: Piter (In Russian).
Schunk D.H. (2012) Learning Theories an Educational Perspective. Boston: Pearson.
Sen A. (1999) Development as Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University.
Serikov V.V. (1998) Personality-Oriented Education: The Search for a New Paradigm. Available at: http://www.bim-bad.ru/docs/serikov_education_of_personality.pdf (accessed 20 September 2024) (In Russian).
Snelbecker G.E. (1999) Some Thoughts about Theories, Perfection, and Instruction. Instructional Design Theories and Models: A New Paradigm of Instructional Theory (ed. C.M. Reigeluth), Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 31–47.
Snowman J., Biehler R.F. (2005) Psychology Applied to Teaching. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Sorokin P.S. (2023) The Problem of "Agency" through the Prism of a New Reality: Conditions and Perspectives. Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniia / Sociological Studies, no 3, pp. 103–114 (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.31857/S013216250022927-2
Sorokin P.S. (ed.) (2022) Independence and Proactive Behavior. Moscow: HSE (In Russian).
Sorokin P.S. (2021) Sociological Theory: Challenges and Opportunities for Russian Sociology. Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniia / Sociological Studies, no 11, pp. 12–23 (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.31857/S013216250017006-9
Sorokin P.S. (2020) The Promise of John W. Meyer’s World Society Theory: “Otherhood” through the Prism of Pitirim A. Sorokin’s Integralism. The American Sociologist, vol. 51, no 4, pp. 506–525. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-020-09468-8
Sorokin P.S., Zykova A.V. (2021) «Transformative Agency» as a Subject of Research and Development in the 21st Century: A Review and Interpretation of International Experience. Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes, no 5, pp. 216–241 (In Russian). https://doi.org/ 10.14515/monitoring.2021.5.1858
Stepashkina E.A., Sukhodoev A.K., Gudgelya D.Yu. (2022) The Research on the Essential Range of Soft Skills Enquired by Leading Employers during the Process of Recruitment of University Graduates and Young Professionals. Moscow: HSE (In Russian).
Stewart M. (2021) Understanding Learning: Theories and Critique. University Teaching in Focus (eds D. Chalmers, L. Hunt), London, New York: Routledge, pp. 3–28.
Toffler A. (1999) The Third Wave. Moscow: AST (In Russian).
Vasiliev K., Roshchin S., Maltseva I., Travkin P., Lukiyanova A., Chugunov D. et al. (2015) Developing Skills for Innovative Growth in Russia. Moscow: Alex (In Russian).
Zimmerman B.J., Moylan A.R. (2009) Self-Regulation: Where Metacognition and Motivation Intersect. Handbook of Metacognition in Education (eds D.J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, A.C. Graesser), New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 299–315.
.jpg){kind=small}
