Feedback Spillovers across Unrelated Tasks
Abstract
In this paper we describe the results of a laboratory experiment involving 130 students of Lomonosov Moscow State University. The participants were asked to perform unrelated tasks involving different skills: a test of analytical skills and a capitals quiz. After the first task, participants in the treatment group are given feedback on whether they did better or worse than half of the other participants in their group. This feedback is uninformative about the new task, as success or failure in the analytical ability test is not related to whether the individual knows the countries and their capitals. It is revealed that students respond to negative feedback: participants from the group that received negative feedback significantly lower their probability of success in the next task. The peculiarity of the work is to conduct the experiment within 2 days in order to avoid the occurrence of the “hot hand error” described in previous studies. Statistical tests and regression analysis as well as bootstrap are used to test the hypotheses. A time-stable effect of uninformative relative to the new task feedback is obtained.
Downloads
References
Araujo de P., Lagos S. (2013) Self-Esteem, Education, and Wages Revisited. Journal of Economic Psychology, vol. 34, February, pp. 120–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2012.12.001
Azmat G., Bagues M., Cabrales A., Iriberri N. (2019) What You Don’t Know…Can’t Hurt You? A Natural Field Experiment on Relative Performance Feedback in Higher Education. Management Science, vol. 65, no 8, pp. 3714–3736. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2018.3131
Azmat G., Iriberri N. (2010) The Importance of Relative Performance Feedback Information: Evidence from a Natural Experiment Using High School Students. Journal of Public Economics, vol. 94, no 7–8, pp. 435–452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2010.04.001
Banerjee R., Gupta N.D., Villeval M.C. (2020) Feedback Spillovers across Tasks, Self-Confidence and Competitiveness. Games and Economic Behavior, vol. 123, September, pp. 127–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2020.07.002
Barankay I. (2012) Rank Incentives: Evidence from a Randomized Workplace Experiment. Business Economics and Public Policy Papers. Available at: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:5765998 (accessed 20 July 2024).
Barron K. (2021) Belief Updating: Does the ‘Good-News, Bad-News’ Asymmetry Extend to Purely Financial Domains? Experimental Economics, vol. 24, no 1, pp. 31–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-020-09653-z
Bénabou R., Tirole J. (2016) Mindful Economics: The Production, Consumption, and Value of Beliefs. Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 30, no 3, pp. 141–164. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.30.3.141
Brandts J., Groenert V., Rott C. (2015) The Impact of Advice on Women’s and Men’s Selection into Competition. Management Science, vol. 61, no 5, pp. 1018–1035. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2013.1877
Burks S.V., Carpenter J.P., Goette L., Rustichini A. (2013) Overconfidence and Social Signaling. Review of Economic Studies, vol. 80, no 3, pp. 949–983. https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rds046
Buser T. (2016) The Impact of Losing in a Competition on the Willingness to Seek Further Challenges. Management Science, vol. 62, no 12, pp. 3439–3449. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2015.2321
Buser T., Gerhards L., van der Weele J. (2018) Responsiveness to Feedback as a Personal Trait. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, vol. 56, no 2, pp. 165–192. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11166-018-9277-3/TABLES/7
Buser T., Yuan H. (2016) Do Women Give Up Competing More Easily? Evidence from the Lab and the Dutch Math Olympiad. Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper no 16-096/I. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2867346
Carrillo J.D., Mariotti T. (2000) Strategic Ignorance as a Self-Disciplining Device. Review of Economic Studies, vol. 67, no 3, pp. 529–544. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-937x.00142
Davison A.C., Hinkley D.V. (1997) Bootstrap Methods and their Application in Bootstrap Methods and their Application. Cambridge: Cambridge University. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511802843
Drouvelis M., Paiardini P. (2022) Feedback Quality and Performance in Organizations. Leadership Quarterly, vol. 33, no 6, Article no 101534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2021.101534
Eil D., Rao J.M. (2011) The Good News-Bad News Effect: Asymmetric Processing of Objective Information about Yourself. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, vol. 3, no 2, pp. 114–138. https://doi.org/10.1257/mic.3.2.114
Ertac S. (2011) Does Self-Relevance Affect Information Processing? Experimental Evidence on the Response to Performance and Non-Performance Feedback. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, vol. 80, no 3, pp. 532–545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2011.05.012
Filippin A., Gioia F. (2018) Competition and Subsequent Risk-Taking Behaviour: Heterogeneity across Gender and Outcomes. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, vol. 75, August, pp. 84–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2018.05.003
Gill D., Prowse V. (2012) A Structural Analysis of Disappointment Aversion in a Real Effort Competition. American Economic Review, vol. 102, iss. 1, pp. 469–503. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.102.1.469
Gilovich T., Vallone R., Tversky A. (1985) The Hot Hand in Basketball: On the Misperception of Random Sequences. Cognitive Psychology, vol. 17, no 3, pp. 295–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(85)90010-6
Grossman Z., Owens D. (2012) An Unlucky Feeling: Overconfidence and Noisy Feedback. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, vol. 84, no 2, pp. 510–524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2012.08.006
Hermes H., Huschens M., Rothlauf F., Schunk D. (2019) Motivating Low-Achievers—Relative Performance Feedback in Primary Schools. NHH Dept. of Economics Discussion Paper no 14. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3411429
Huang L., Murad Z. (2019) Feedback Spillover Effect on Competitiveness Across Unrelated Tasks. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3436581 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3436581 (accessed 12 August 2024).
Karlsson N., Loewenstein G., Seppi D. (2009) The Ostrich Effect: Selective Attention to Information Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, vol. 38, no 2, pp. 95–115. https://doi.org/10.1007/sl
Kuhnen C. M., Tymula A. (2012) Feedback, Self-Esteem, and Performance in Organizations. Management Science, vol. 58, no 1, pp. 94–113. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1110.1379
Linhares L.V., Torres A.R.R., Pereira C.R. (2022) Live by the Sword, Die by the Sword: Measuring Belief in a Just World with Popular Sayings. Personality and Individual Differences, vol. 195, September, Article no 111673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2022.111673
Lovász A., Cukrowska-Torzewska E., Rigó M., Szabó-Morvai Á. (2022) Gender Differences in the Effect of Subjective Feedback in an Online Game. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, vol. 98, June, Article no 101854. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2022.101854
Mammen E. (1992) Bootstrap, Wild Bootstrap, and Asymptotic Normality. Probability Theory and Related Fields, vol. 93, no 4, pp. 439–455. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01192716
Mayraz G. (2011) Wishful Thinking. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1955644 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1955644 (accessed 20 July 2024).
McLeod C., Ponesse J.E. (2008) Infertility and Moral Luck: The Politics of Women Blaming Themselves for Infertility IJFAB. International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics, vol. 1, no 1, pp. 125–144. https://doi.org/10.1353/IJF.0.0001
Mezulis H.A., Abramson Y.L., Hyde S.J., Hankin L.B. (2004) Is There a Universal Positivity Bias in Attributions? A Meta-Analytic Review of Individual, Developmental, and Cultural Differences in the Self-Serving Attributional Bias. Psychological Bulletin, vol. 130, no 5, pp. 711–747. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.130.5.711
Miller D.T., Ross M. (1975) Self-Serving Biases in the Attribution of Causality: Fact or Fiction? Psychological Bulletin, vol. 82, no 2, pp. 213–225. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0076486
Möbius M.M., Niederle M., Niehaus P., Rosenblat T.S. (2022) Managing Self-Confidence: Theory and Experimental Evidence. Management Science, vol. 68, no 11, pp. 7793–8514. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2021.4294
Moore D. A., Healy P. J. (2008) The Trouble with Overconfidence. Psychological Review, vol. 115, no 2, pp. 502–517. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.115.2.502
Raven J., Raven J.C., Court J.H. (1998) Raven Manual: Section 4, Advanced Progressive Matrices. Oxford: Oxford Psychologists.
Schwardmann P., van der Weele J. (2019) Deception and Self-Deception. Nature Human Behaviour, vol. 3, no 10, pp. 1055–1061. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0666-7
Shah P., Harris A.J.L., Bird G., Catmur C., Hahn U. (2016) A Pessimistic View of Optimistic Belief Updating. Cognitive Psychology, vol. 90, November, pp. 71–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2016.05.004
Sharot T. (2011) The Optimism Bias: A Tour of the Irrationally Positive Brain Choice. New York, NY: Pantheon Books.
Shastry G.K., Shurchkov O., Xia L.L. (2020) Luck or Skill: How Women and Men React to Noisy Feedback. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, vol. 88, October, Article no 101592. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2020.101592
Steegh A., Höffler T., Höft L., Parchmann I. (2021) First Steps toward Gender Equity in the Chemistry Olympiad: Understanding the Role of Implicit Gender-Science Stereotypes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, vol. 58, no 1, pp. 40–68. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21645
Svenson O. (1981) Are We All Less Risky and More Skillful Than Our Fellow Drivers? Acta Psychologica, vol. 47, no 2, pp. 143–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6918(81)90005-6
Sweeny K., Melnyk D., Miller W., Shepperd J. A. (2010) Information Avoidance: Who, What, When, and Why. Review of General Psychology, vol. 14, no 4, pp. 340–353. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021288
Tran A., Zeckhauser R. (2012) Rank as an Inherent Incentive: Evidence from a Field Experiment. Journal of Public Economics, vol. 96, no 9–10, pp. 645–650. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2012.05.004
Verna M. (2002) Understanding Gender Inequity in America: Interviews with Academic Olympians. Research in Education. Available at: https://www.academia.edu/27019003/Understanding_gender_inequity_in_America_Interviews_with_academic_Olympians (accessed 20 July 2024).
Villeval M.C. (2020) Performance Feedback and Peer Effects: A Review. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3550667
Wilcox R.R., Keselman H.J. (2003) Modern Robust Data Analysis Methods: Measures of Central Tendency. Psychological Methods, vol. 8, no 3, pp. 254–274. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.8.3.254
Wozniak D., Harbaugh W.T., Mayr U. (2016) The Effect of Feedback on Gender Differences in Competitive Choices. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1976073 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1976073 (accessed 12 August 2024).
Wozniak D., Harbaugh W. T., Mayr U. (2014) The Menstrual Cycle and Performance Feedback Alter Gender Differences in Competitive Choices. Journal of Labor Economics, vol. 32, no 1, pp. 161–198. https://doi.org/10.1086/673324
Wu C.F.J. (2007) Jackknife, Bootstrap and Other Resampling Methods in Regression Analysis. The Annals of Statistics, vol. 14, no 4, pp. 1261–1295. https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1176350142
Zimmermann F. (2020) The Dynamics of Motivated Beliefs. American Economic Review, vol. 110, no 2, pp. 337–361. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20180728
.jpg){kind=small}
