Computational Psychometrics: Near Future or Reality

Keywords: computational psychometrics, machine learning, educational assessment, evidence-centered design

Abstract

This book continues a series of books on the methodology of educational testing and assessment written by leading psychometricians and researchers in the field of educational assessment. Computational psychometrics is defined as the combination of computer science methods and psychometric measurement principles for analysing data obtained as a result of testing using technologically advanced test formats. The first part of the book discusses the changes that have occurred in teaching and educational assessment under the influence of digital technologies. The second part provides an overview of computational psychometric methods: from traditional psychometric models to machine learning technologies.

The material in the book can be useful to students and researchers in the field of psychometrics who are involved in the development, design and analysis of learning systems and measurements using complex test formats and data. The strength of the book is an electronic application containing the code of the R or Python programming environment for the methodological chapters.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Andrews-Todd J., Forsyth C.M. (2020) Exploring Social and Cognitive Dimensions of Collaborative Problem Solving in an Open Online Simulation-Based Task. Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 104, January, Article no 105759. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.10.025

Arieli-Attali M., Ward S., Thomas J., Deonovic B., von Davier A.A. (2019) The Expanded Evidence-Centered Design (E-ECD) for Learning and Assessment Systems: A Framework for Incorporating Learning Goals and Processes within Assessment Design. Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 10, April, Article no 853. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00853

Biswas G., Jeong H., Kinnebrew J.S., Sulcer B., Roscoe R. (2010) Measuring Self-Regulated Learning Skills through Social Interactions in a Teachable Agent Environment. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, vol. 5, no 2, pp. 123–152. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S1793206810000839

Bower M., Lee M.J., Dalgarno B. (2017) Collaborative Learning across Physical and Virtual Worlds: Factors Supporting and Constraining Learners in a Blended Reality Environment. British Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 48, no 2, pp. 407–430. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12435

Davey T., Ferrara S., Shavelson R., Holland P., Webb N., Wise L. (2015) Psychometric Considerations for the Next Generation of Performance Assessment. Report of the Center for K-12 Assessment & Performance Management. Available at: https://www.ets.org/Media/Research/pdf/psychometric_considerations_white_paper.pdf (accessed 20 August 2023).

Davier von A.A. (2015) Virtual and Collaborative Assessments: Examples, Implications, and Challenges for Educational Measurement. Paper presented at the 32nd International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML 2015) (Lille, France, 2015, July 6–11).

DiCerbo K.E., Behrens J.T. (2012) Implications of the Digital Ocean on Current and Future Assessment. Computers and Their Impact on State Assessment: Recent History and Predictions for the Future (eds R. Lissitz, H. Jiao), Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing, pp. 273–306.

Epskamp S., Maris G., Waldorp L.J., Borsboom D. (2018) Network Psychometrics. The Wiley Handbook of Psychometric Testing (eds P. Irwing, D. Hughes, T. Booth), New York, NY: Elsevier.

Graesser A.C., D’Mello S., Hu X., Cai Z., Olney A., Morgan B. (2012) AutoTutor. Applied Natural Language Processing: Identification, Investigation and Resolution (eds P. McCarthy, C. Boonthum-Denecke), Hershey, PA: IGI Global, pp. 169–187. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-60960-741-8

Greeno J.G. (1998) The Situativity of Knowing, Learning, and Research. American Psychologist, vol. 53, no 1, pp. 5–26. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.53.1.5

Kim Y.J., Shute V.J. (2015) The Interplay of Game Elements with Psychometric Qualities, Learning, and Enjoyment in Game-Based Assessment. Computers & Education, vol. 87, no 2, pp. 340–356. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.07.009

Liu L., von Davier A.A., Hao J., Kyllonen P., Zapata-Rivera J.-D. (2015) A Tough Nut to Crack: Measuring Collaborative Problem Solving. Handbook of Research on Computational Tools for Real-World Skill Development (eds Y. Rosen, S. Ferrara, M. Mosharraf), Hershey, PA: IGI-Global, pp. 344–359.

Marsman M., Borsboom D., Kruis J., Epskamp S., van Bork R., Waldorp L. et al. (2018) An Introduction to Network Psychometrics: Relating Ising Network Models to Item Response Theory Models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, vol. 53, no 1, pp 15–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2017.1379379

Mislevy R.J., Almond R.G., Lukas J.F. (2003) A Brief Introduction to Evidence-Centered Design. Center for the Study of Evaluation Report no 632. Los Angeles, CA: University of California. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/j.2333-8504.2003.tb01908.x

Rosé C.P., Ferschke O. (2016) Technology Support for Discussion Based Learning: From Computer Supported Collaborative Learning to the Future of Massive Open Online Courses. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, vol. 26, no 2, pp. 660–678. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40593-016-0107-y

Shute V.J., Ventura M. (2013) Stealth Assessment: Measuring and Supporting Learning in Video Games. Cambridge, MA: MIT. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress%2F9589.001.0001

Snir J., Smith C., Grosslight L. (1993) Conceptually Enhanced Simulations: A Computer Tool for Science Teaching. Journal of Science Education and Technology, vol. 2, no 2, pp. 373–388. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00694526

Wise A.F., Chiu M.M. (2011) Analyzing Temporal Patterns of Knowledge Construction in a Role-Based Online Discussion. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, vol. 6, no 3, pp. 445–470. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11412-011-9120-1

Published
2023-11-06
How to Cite
GrachevaDaria A., and TarasovaKsenia V. 2023. “Computational Psychometrics: Near Future or Reality”. Voprosy Obrazovaniya / Educational Studies Moscow, no. 3 (November). https://doi.org/10.17323/vo-2023-17938.
Section
Book Review