Student Educational Experience and Its Place in the Modern Educational Paradigm: FEFU Case
Abstract
The development of the project on creating world-class campuses in Russia heated debates on the topic of the university campus and the educational experience of students. Although it has become extremely relevant, but it remains understudied. This research is aimed at the formation of an understanding of the educational paradigm of modern Russian universities as well as the investigation of the relationship between the university space and the educational experience of students using the example of the Far Eastern Federal University (FEFU), which is a unique case among Russian universities due to its exceptional location and infrastructure. Building on the concept of Beckers and his colleagues’ theory "Purpose - Process - Place," a deductive analysis of 39 semi-structured interviews with FEFU students collected in 2022 was carried out. The study showed that higher education is undergoing a transition from a traditional behavioristic approach to social constructivism, which is manifested in the request for greater freedom in choosing not only what students should study, but when and how. The results of the study show that the educational process has moved beyond the classroom, and the educational environment has become an integral part of the educational experience of students. The results suggest that students have a need not only for learning spaces, but also for places where they can restore their resources. Thus, green spaces on the campus and an embankment with access to the water area have a favorable effect on the emotional state of students. At the same time co-workings and coffee shops can foster more productive learning. However, the location of the campus, its isolation from the mainland and its own rules of behavior and communication, forms in some students the perception of the campus as a “luxury prison” with a comfortable infrastructure but difficult to escape from. This is especially felt during the exams, when the emotional overload of students reaches peak points. The results can be useful for Russian universities participating in the project on creating world-class campuses and for researchers who study the educational environment.
Downloads
References
Astin A.W. (1993) What Matters in College? Four Critical Years Revisited. Vol. 1. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Barr R.B., Tagg J. (1995) From Teaching to Learning—A New Paradigm for Undergraduate Education. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, vol. 27, no 6, pp. 12–26. https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/slcehighered/60
Beckers R., van der Voordt T., Dewulf G. (2015) A Conceptual Framework to Identify Spatial Implications of New Ways of Learning in Higher Education. Facilities, vol. 33, no 1/2, pp. 2–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/F-02-2013-0013
Bers T.H., Smith K.E. (1991) Persistence of Community College Students: The Influence of Student Intent and Academic and Social Integration. Research in Higher Education, vol. 32, pp. 539–556. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992627
Blyth A., Velissaratou J. (2019) Analytical Framework for Case Study Collection. Paris: OECD. Available at: http://www.oecd.org/officialdocuments/publicdisplaydocumentpdf/?cote=EDU/EDPC/GNEELE(2018)3/REV1&docLanguage=En (accessed 8 August 2024).
Bratman G.N., Hamilton J.P., Daily G.C. (2012) The Impacts of Nature Experience on Human Cognitive Function and Mental Health. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 1249, no 1, pp. 118–136. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06400.x
Center for Strategic Research, VEB RF, University "20.35" (2021) University Campuses and the City: Cooperation for the Sake of Competitiveness (In Russian). Available at: https://www.csr.ru/upload/iblock/3f0/kbpm276p3tau6knlzdla3d6ozz0fve0e.pdf En (accessed 8 August 2024).
Cherkasskaya Yu.S., Pimenova E.V. (2019) Coworking as a Public Space in the Structure of Higher Educational Institutions. E-Scio, no 5 (32), pp. 507–511 (In Russian).
Cox A.M., Benson Marshall M., Burnham J.A.J., Care L., Herrick T., Jones M. (2022) Mapping the Campus Learning Landscape. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, vol. 30, no 2, pp. 149–167. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2020.1788124
De Boer H. (2021) COVID-19 in Dutch Higher Education. Studies in Higher Education, vol. 46, no 1, pp. 96–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2020.1859684
Duffy F., Craig D., Gillen N. (2011) Purpose, Process, Place: Design as a Research Tool. Facilities, vol. 29, no 3/4, pp. 97–113. https://doi.org/10.1108/02632771111109243
Ershova N.R., Sungurova N.R. (2021) The Landscape Improvement of the University Campus, as a Way to Create the Image of an Educational Institution. Tendentsii razvitiya nauki i obrazovaniya, vol. 70, no 2, pp. 36–39 (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.18411/lj-02-2021-47
Gulwadi G.B., Mishchenko E.D., Hallowell G., Alves S., Kennedy M. (2019) The Restorative Potential of a University Campus: Objective Greenness and Student Perceptions in Turkey and the United States. Landscape and Urban Planning, vol. 187, July, pp. 36–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.03.003
Hajrasouliha A.H., Ewing R. (2016) Campus Does Matter. Planning for Higher Education Journal, vol. 44, no 3, pp. 30–45. Available at: http://restorativeworkplace.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/Campus_Does_Matter-2.pdf (accessed 8 August 2024).
Hutchinson L. (2003) Educational Environment. British Medical Journal, vol. 326(7393), pp. 810–812. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.326.7393.810
Imms W., Mahat M. (2021) Where to Now? Fourteen Characteristics of Teachers’ Transition into Innovative Learning Environments. Teacher Transition into Innovative Learning Environments (eds W. Imms, T. Kvan), Singapore: Springer, pp. 317–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-7497-9_25
Isaeva N.V., Borisova L.V. (2013) Comparative Analysis of National Policies for Developing Research Universities' Campuses. University Management: Practice and Analysis, no 6, pp. 74–87 (In Russian).
Jones M.G., Brader-Araje L. (2002) The Impact of Constructivism on Education: Language, Discourse, and Meaning. American Communication Journal, vol. 5, no 3, pp. 1–10. http://ac-journal.org/journal/vol5/iss3/special/jones.pdf
Kärnä S., Julin P. (2015) A Framework for Measuring Student and Staff Satisfaction with University Campus Facilities. Quality Assurance in Education, vol. 23, no 1, pp. 47–66. https://doi.org/10.1108/QAE-10-2013-0041
Klyagin A.V., Abalmasova E.S., Garev K.V., Gruzdev I.A., Egorov A.A., Zakharova U.S. et al. (2020) First Weeks Storm: How Higher Education Entered into Reality of Pandemic. Moscow: HSE (In Russian).
Komensky Ja.A. (1989) Great Didactics. Pedagogical Legacy (eds V.M. Klarin, A.N. Dzhurinskiy), Moscow: Pedagogika, pp. 11–136 (In Russian).
Kop R., Hill A. (2020) Connectivism: Learning Theory of the Future or Vestige of the Past? International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, vol. 9, no 3, pp. 1–13. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v9i3.523
Lee A.C., Maheswaran R. (2011) The Health Benefits of Urban Green Spaces: A Review of the Evidence. Journal of Public Health, vol. 33, no 2, pp. 212–222. https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdq068
Ledniova V.S., Moshurova L.V., Korchagina N.S., Kolomatskaia V.V. (2020) The Paradigms of Modern Education. Education and Pedagogy: Theory, Methodology, Experience (eds Zh.V. Murzina, O.L. Bogatyreva), Cheboksary: Sreda, pp. 72–81 (In Russian).
MacKean G. (2011) Mental Health and Well-Being in Post-Secondary Education Settings. A Literature and Environmental Scan to Support Planning and Action in Canada. Available at: https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=8c2428f276e643d92a0937f3251617ddec46b5f9 (accessed 8 August 2024).
Manuylov Y.S. (2016) Environmental Approach in the Context of Lev Vygotsky's Pedagogical Ideas. Vestnik of Kostroma State University. Series: Pedagogy. Psychology. Sociokinetics, no 4, pp. 315–319 (In Russian).
Marais N. (2011) Connectivism as Learning Theory: The Force behind Changed Teaching Practice in Higher Education. Education, Knowledge and Economy, vol. 4, no 3, pp. 173–182. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17496896.2010.556478
Mayhew M.J., Rockenbach A.N., Bowman N.A., Seifert T.A., Wolniak G.C. (2016) How College Affects Students: 21st Century Evidence that Higher Education Works, vol. 1, San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons.
McLaughlin P., Faulkner J. (2012) Flexible Spaces… What Students Expect from University Facilities. Journal of Facilities Management, vol. 10, no 2, pp. 140–149. https://doi.org/10.1108/14725961211218776
Merriam S.B., Caffarella R.S., Baumgartner L.M. (2007) Learning in Adulthood: A Comprehensive Guide. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons/Jossey-Bass.
Murphy M.C., Gopalan M., Carter E.R., Emerson K.T., Bottoms B.L., Walton G.M. (2020) A Customized Belonging Intervention Improves Retention of Socially Disadvantaged Students at a Broad-Access University. Science Advances, no 6, Article no eaba4677. https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/sciadv.aba4677
Ninnemann K., Liedtke B., den Heijer A., Gothe K., Loidl-Reisch C., Nenonen S., Nestler J., Tieva A., Wallenborg C. (2020) Hybrid Environments for Universities. Berlin: Waxmann Verlag. http://dx.doi.org/10.31244/9783830991793
Payne S. (2009) Open Space: People Space. Book review. Journal of Environmental Psychology, vol. 29, no 4, pp. 532–533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.10.007
Rudd T., Gifford C., Morrison J., Facer K. (2006) What if …Re-Imagining Learning Spaces. Bristol: Future Lab.
Sankari I., Peltokorpi A., Nenonen S. (2018) A Call for Co-Working–Users’ Expectations Regarding Learning Spaces in Higher Education. Journal of Corporate Real Estate, vol. 20, no 2, pp. 117–137. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCRE-03-2017-0007
Shcheglova I., Vilkova K., Dremova O. (2022) Online Learning: Expectations versus Reality. Digital Transformation and Disruption of Higher Education (ed. A. Kaplan), Cambridge: Cambridge University, pp. 22–33.
Siemens G. (2008) Learning and Knowing in Networks: Changing Roles for Educators and Designers. Paper 105: University of Georgia IT. Available at: http://it.coe.uga.edu/itforum/Paper105/Siemens.pdf (accessed 2 August 2024).
Stanton A., Zandvliet D., Dhaliwal R., Black T. (2016) Understanding Students’ Experiences of Well-Being in Learning Environments. Higher Education Studies, vol. 6, no 3, pp. 90–99. https://doi.org/10.5539/hes.v6n3p90
Tharani A., Husain Y., Warwick I. (2017) Learning Environment and Emotional Well-Being: A Qualitative Study of Undergraduate Nursing Students. Nurse Education Today, vol. 59, December, pp. 82–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2017.09.008
Triguero-Mas M., Dadvand P., Cirach M., Martínez D., Medina A., Mompart A., Nieuwenhuijsen M.J. (2015) Natural Outdoor Environments and Mental and Physical Health: Relationships and Mechanisms. Environment International, vol. 77, April, pp. 35–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2015.01.012
Valks B., Blokland E., Elissen C., van Loon I., Roozemond D., Uiterdijk P., Arkesteijn M., Koutamanis A., Den Heijer A. (2021) Supporting Strategic Decision-Making on the Future Campus with Space Utilisation Studies: A Case Study. Property Management, vol. 39, no 4, pp. 441–465. https://doi.org/10.1108/PM-09-2020-0054
Valtonen T., Leppänen U., Hyypiä M., Kokko A., Manninen J., Vartiainen H., Hirsto L. (2021) Learning Environments Preferred by University Students: A Shift Toward Informal and Flexible Learning Environments. Learning Environments Research, vol. 24, November, pp. 371–388. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-020-09339-6
Vilkova K., Shcheglova I., Dremova O. (2021) The Challenges of Distance Learning to Student Mental Health. Higher Education in Russia and Beyond, vol. 27, no 2, pp. 12–14.
Vinogradova I,A., Ivanova E.V. (2017) Study of Students’ and Teachers’ Opinion on University Environment. Pedagogical Review, no 1 (15), pp. 62–71 (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.23951/2307-6127-2017-1-62-71
Zagirova F.R. (2018) Academic Diversity and University Governance: The Formation of a Research Agenda. University Management: Practice and Analysis, vol. 22, no 3, pp. 141–154 (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.15826/umpa.2018.03.033
.jpg){kind=small}
