Student Motivation: Barriers and Incentives for Agency

Keywords: learner motivation, learner agency, autonomy and control in pedagogical interaction, self-determination theory, Bernstein's theory of pedagogic framing

Abstract

Our starting point was the often-overlooked understanding that motivation problems aren't a diagnosis but a symptom. They indicate the actual issue - an environment insufficient for fulfilling autonomy needs, which often escapes the attention of teachers, parents, and even researchers. Our goal was to develop a framework for exploring the main characteristics of a schoolchild's educational environment to identify the source of motivation problems. To do this, we combined aspects of the self-determination theory of E. Deci and R. Ryan with B. Bernstein's framing theory.

The self-determination theory helps to consider human motivation from a psychological point of view, while B. Bernstein's framing theory opens a sociological perspective. Including Bernstein's ideas enriches the motivation analysis, highlighting sociological aspects that are not fully accounted for in the self-determination theory. The result is more comprehensive and, at the same time, more "visible" and easier to operationalize in the context of formal school or home education. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahmadi A., Noetel M., Parker P., Ryan R.M., Ntoumanis N., Reeve J. et al. (2023) A Classification System for Teachers’ Motivational Behaviors Recommended in Self-Determination Theory Interventions. Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 115, no 8, pp. 1158–1176. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000783

Amabile T.M., Hill K.G., Hennessey B.A., Tighe E.M. (1994) The Work Preference Inventory: Assessing Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivational Orientations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 66, no 5, pp. 950–967. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.66.5.950

Baker A.R., Lin T.J., Chen J., Paul N., Anderson R.C., Nguyen-Jahiel K. (2017) Effects of Teacher Framing on Student Engagement during Collaborative Reasoning Discussions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, vol. 51, October, pp. 253–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2017.08.007

Bandura A. (1997) Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York, NY: W.H. Freeman.

Bandura A. (1977) Self-Efficacy: Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavioral Change. Psychological Review, vol. 84, no 2, pp. 191–215. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191

Bernstein B. (2008) Klass, kody i kontrol´: struktura pedagogicheskogo diskursa [Class, Codes and Control: The Structuring of Pedagogic Discourse]. Moscow: Prosveshchenie.

Bernstein B. (2003) Class, Codes and Control. London, New York: Routledge.

Bernstein B. (2000) Pedagogy, Symbolic Control and Identity – Theory, Research, Critique. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

Bernstein B. (1996) Pedagogy, Symbolic Control and Identity: Theory, Research, Critique. London: Taylor and Francis.

Böheim R., Schnitzler K., Gröschner A., Weil M., Knogler M., Schindler A.K., Alles M., Seidel T. (2021) How Changes in Teachers' Dialogic Discourse Practice Relate to Changes in Students' Activation, Motivation and Cognitive Engagement. Learning Culture and Social Interaction, vol. 28, March, Article no 100450. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2020.100450

Cheon S.H., Reeve J., Vansteenkiste M. (2020) When Teachers Learn How to Provide Classroom Structure in Autonomy-Supportive Way: Benefits to Teachers and Their Students. Teaching and Teacher Education, vol. 90, April, Article no 103004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.103004

Chiang T.-H., Thurston A., Zhao J., Hao Y., Ma J., Dong Y. (2020) The Practice of Weak Framing from Teachers’ Perceptions in China. British Journal of Sociology of Education, vol. 41, no 8, https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2020.1806039

Chirkov V., Ryan R.M., Kim Y., Kaplan U. (2003) Differentiating Autonomy from Individualism and Independence: A Self-Determination Theory Perspective on Internalization of Cultural Orientations and Well-Being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 84, no 1, pp. 97–110. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.1.97

Corpus J.H., Robinson K.A., Liu Zh. (2022) Comparing College Students’ Motivation Trajectories before and during COVID-19: A Self-Determination Theory Approach. Frontiers in Education, vol. 7, March, Article no 848643. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.848643

Csikszentmihalyi M. (1990) Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. New York, NY: Harper & Row.

Deci E.L., Ryan R.M. (1985) Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior. New York, NY: Plenum.

Dieh M., Lindgren J., Leffler E. (2015) The Impact of Classification and Framing in Entrepreneurial Education: Field Observations in Two Lower Secondary Schools. Universal Journal of Educational Research, vol. 3, no 8, pp. 489–501. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2015.030803

Distefano R., Meuwissen A.S. (2022) Parenting in Context: A Systematic Review of the Correlates of Autonomy Support. Journal of Family Theory & Review, vol. 14, no 4, pp. 571–592. https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12465

Dobryakova M.S., Yurchenko O.V. (2023) Agentnost´ i semejnye obrazovatel´nye strategii: mezhdu sil´noy shkoloy i svobodoy anskulinga [Family Agency and Educational Strategies: Between the Strong Framing of Schooling and the Freedom of Unschooling]. Moscow: HSE.

Dobryakova M., Yurchenko O., Sivak E. (2021) Opyt distantsionnogo obucheniya i defitsity sovremennoy shkoly: pozitsii shkol´nikov i roditeley [The Experience of Distance Learning and the Deficits of Modern Schools: The Positions of Schoolchildren and Parents]. Moscow: HSE.

Dweck C.S. (2000) Self-Theories: Their Role in Motivation, Personality, and Development. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.

Feltman R., Elliot A.J. (2012) Approach and Avoidance Motivation. Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning (ed. N.M. Seel), Boston, MA: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6_1749

Foucault M. (2022) Nadzirat´ i nakazyvat´. Rozhdenie tyur´my [To Oversee and Punish. The Birth of the Prison]. Moscow: Ad Marginem.

Gorgeeva T.O. (2022) Motivatsiya shkol´nikov XXI veka: prakticheskie sovety [Motivation of Schoolchildren of the XXI Century: Practical Tips]. Moscow: Charitable Foundation "Contribution to the Future".

Gordeeva T.O., Sychev O.A. (2021) Diagnostika motiviruyushchego i demotiviruyushchego stiley uchiteley: metodika "Situatsii v shkole" [Diagnostics of Motivating and Demotivating Styles of Teachers: “Situations-in-School” Questionnaire]. Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie / Psychological Science and Education, vol. 26, no 1, pp. 51–65. https://doi.org/10.17759/pse.2021260103

Gordeeva T.O., Sychev O.A., Sukhanovskaia A.V. (2022) Dinamika uchebnoy motivatsii i orientatsii na otsenki u rossijskikh podrostkov v period s 1999 po 2020 gg. [Dynamics of Academic Motivation and Orientation towards the Grades of Russian Teenagers in the Period from 1999 to 2020]. Cultural-Historical Psychology, vol. 18, no 3, pp. 104–112. https://doi.org/10.17759/chp.2022180313

Grolnick W. (2002) The Psychology of Parental Control: How Well-Meant Parenting Backfires. New York, NY: Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410606303

Grolnick W.S., Deci E.L., Ryan R.M. (1997) Internalization within the Family: The Self-Determination Theory Perspective. Parenting and Children's Internalization of Values: A Handbook of Contemporary Theory (eds J.E. Grusec, L. Kuczynski), New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons Inc., pp. 135–161.

Howard J.L., Bureau J., Guay F., Chong J.X.Y., Ryan R.M. (2021) Student Motivation and Associated Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis from Self-Determination Theory. Perspectives on Psychological Science, vol. 16, no 6, pp. 1300–1323. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1745691620966789

Illich I. (2006) Osvobozhdenie ot shkol. Proportsional´nost´ i sovremenny mir [Exemption from Schools. Proportionality and the Modern World]. Moscow: Prosveshchenie.

Katz J. (1983) A Theory of Qualitative Methodology: The Social Science System of Analytic Fieldwork. Contemporary Field Research (ed. R.M. Emerson), Boston: Little, Brown, pp. 127–148.

Kohn A. (2017) Shkola dlya detey, a ne naoborot. Budushchee bez otsenok i domashnikh zadaniy [The Schools Our Children Deserve: Moving Beyond Traditional Classrooms and "Tougher Standards"]. Moscow: Resurs.

Maloshonok N.G., Semenova T.V., Terentev E.A. (2015) Uchebnaya motivatsiya studentov rossijskikh vuzov: vozmozhnosti teoreticheskogo osmysleniya [Academic Motivation among Students of Russian Higher Education Establishments: Introspection]. Voprosy obrazovaniya / Educational Studies Moscow, no 3, pp. 92–121. https://doi.org/10.17323/1814-9545-2015-3-92-121

Marshall M.N. (1996) Sampling for Qualitative Research. Family Practice, vol. 13, no 6, p. 522–525.

Mertsalova T.A., Kosaretskiy S.G., Anchikov K.M., Zair-Bek S.I., Zvyagintsev R.S., Kersha Yu. D., Senina N.A. (2022) Shkol´noe obrazovanie v kontekste natsional´nykh tseley i prioritetnykh proektov: analiticheskiy doklad [School Education in the Context of National Goals and Priority Projects: Analytical Report]. Moscow: HSE. http://dx.doi.org/10.17323/978-5-7598-2693-4

OECD (2019) PISA 2018 Results. Vol. III: What School Life Means for Students’ Lives. Paris: OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/acd78851-en

OECD (2017) PISA 2015 Results. Vol. III: Students’ Well-Being. Paris: OECD. Available at: http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/pisa-2015-results-volume-iii_9789264273856-en (accessed 2 December 2023).

Patall E.A., Dent A.L., Oyer M., Wynn S.R. (2013) Student Autonomy and Course Value: The Unique and Cumulative Roles of Various Teacher Practices. Motivation and Emotion, vol. 37, March, pp. 14–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-012-9305-6

Polivanova K.N., Bochaver A.A., Pavlenko K.V., Sivak E.V. (2020) Obrazovanie za stenami shkoly. Kak roditeli proektiruyut obrazovatel'noe prostranstvo detej [Education outside School. How Parents Design Children’s Educational Space]. Moscow: HSE.

Ragin C.C. (2023) Analytic Induction for Social Research. Oakland, CA: University of California. https://doi.org/10.1525/luminos.159

Reeve J. (2009) Why Teachers Adopt a Controlling Motivating Style Toward Students and How They Can Become More Autonomy Supportive. Educational Psychologist, vol. 44, no 3, pp. 159–175. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00461520903028990

Reeve J. (2006) Teachers as Facilitators: What Autonomy-Supportive Teachers Do and Why Their Students Benefit. The Elementary School Journal, vol. 106, no 3, pp. 225–236. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/501484

Reeve J., Vansteenkiste M., Assor A., AhmadI., Cheon S.H., Jang H. et al. (2014) The Beliefs that Underlie Autonomy-Supportive and Controlling Teaching: A Multinational Investigation. Motivation and Emotion, vol. 38, no 1, pp. 93–110. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11031-013-9367-0

Ryan R.M., Deci E.L. (2020) Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation from a Self-Determination Theory Perspective: Definitions, Theory, Practices, and Future Directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, vol. 61, April, Article no 101860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860

Ryan R.M., Deci E.L. (2000) Self-Determination Theory and the Facilitation of Intrinsic Motivation, Social Development, and Well-Being. American Psychologist, vol. 55, no 1, pp. 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68

Schwartz B. (2004) The Paradox of Choice: Why More is Less. New York, NY: Harper Perennial.

Sheldon K.M., Hilpert J.C. (2012) The Balanced Measure of Psychological Needs (BMPN) Scale: An Alternative Domain General Measure of Need Satisfaction. Motivation and Emotion, vol. 36, no 4, pp. 439–451. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-012-9279-4

Singh K., Granville M., Dika S. (2002) Mathematics and Science Achievement: Effects of Motivation, Interest, and Academic Engagement. Journal of Educational Research, vol. 95, no 6, pp. 323–332. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00220670209596607

Vansteenkiste M., Simons J., Lens W., Soenens B., Matos L. (2005) Examining the Motivational Impact of Intrinsic Versus Extrinsic Goal Framing and Autonomy Supportive Versus Internally Controlling Communication Style on Early Adolescents' Academic. Child Development, vol. 76, no 2, pp. 483–501. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1467-8624.2005.00858.X

Vansteenkiste M., Sierens E., Goossens L., Soenens B., Dochy F., Mouratidis A., Aelterman N., Haerens L., Beyers W. (2012) Identifying Сonfigurations of Perceived Teacher Autonomy Support and Structure: Associations with Self-Regulated Learning, Motivation and Problem behavior. Learning and Instruction, vol. 22, no 6 pp. 431–439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.04.002

Wang Q., Pomerantz E. (2009) The Motivational Landscape of Early Adolescence in the United States and China: A Longitudinal Investigation. Child Development, vol. 80, no 4, pp. 1272–1287. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01331.x

Yang D., Chen P., Wang H., Wang K., Huang R. (2022) Teachers' Autonomy Support and Student Engagement: A Systematic Literature Review of Longitudinal Studies. Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 13, August, Article no 925955. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.925955

Published
2024-04-04
How to Cite
DobryakovaMaria S., and YurchenkoOlesya V. 2024. “Student Motivation: Barriers and Incentives for Agency”. Voprosy Obrazovaniya / Educational Studies Moscow, no. 1 (April). https://doi.org/10.17323/vo-2024-17074.
Section
Research Articles