Double Reduction Policy in Chinese Education: Promises, Outcomes, Perspectives

  • Irina Shcheglova Xi’an Jiaotong-Liverpool University (China) https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5949-9617
  • Jiaqi Fu Xi’an Jiaotong-Liverpool University (China) https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8981-5112
  • Xianglin Zhang Xi’an Jiaotong-Liverpool University (China)
  • Ye Zhang Xi’an Jiaotong-Liverpool University (China)
  • Yuqing Wang Xi’an Jiaotong-Liverpool University (China)
  • Rui Yin Xi’an Jiaotong-Liverpool University (China)
  • Xiao Zhong Xi’an Jiaotong-Liverpool University (China)
Ключевые слова: Chinese education, shadow education, double reduction policy, education involution, stakeholder theory

Аннотация

The educational system of China has traditionally been heavily focused on exams, placing a significant academic burden on students and financial pressure on their parents, while also increasing teachers’ workload. The goal of the Double Reduction Policy (DRP) introduced in 2021 was to alleviate some of these societal tensions. Since this is a newly implemented policy, there has been no comprehensive evaluation of its short-term outcomes. Therefore, this study seeks to analyze the projected goals of the DRP, and the tensions in the implementation process from the perspective of the five major stakeholder categories – students and their parents, teachers and schools, local authorities, and private tutoring institutions, as well as evaluate short-term outcomes of the policy from the stakeholders’ perspectives. The study also aims to propose strategies to address and balance these interests and concerns. The findings from a systematic literature review reveal a complex interplay of resulting benefits and challenges for internal and external stakeholders. The DPR has impacted students, parents, teachers, local authorities, and private tutoring institutions. While the policy has shown positive effects on student well-being and alleviated financial pressures for non-wealthy families, it has also intensified socioeconomic disparities and increased teacher workload. Furthermore, the deeply ingrained cultural emphasis on academic achievement among parents has raised questions about the core values and long-term implications of the policy for access to and quality of education. These outcomes highlight the need for adjustments to align policy expectations with stakeholder needs.

Скачивания

Данные скачивания пока не доступны.

Литература

Chen G., Oubibi M., Liang A., Zhou Y. (2022) Parents’ Educational Anxiety under the “Double Reduction” Policy Based on the Family and Students’ Personal Factors. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, vol. 2022, pp. 2067–2082. https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S370339

Chen Y., Huang R., Lu Y., Zhang K. (2021) Education Fever in China: Children’s Academic Performance and Parents’ Life Satisfaction. Journal of Happiness Studies, vol. 22, February, pp. 927–954. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-020-00258-0

Chen Y., Zhao X.X. (2024) The Solution to the Involution of Compulsory Education from the Perspective of “Double Reduction”. Journal of Qingyuan Polytechnic, vol. 17, no 1, pp. 12–17.

Dai K. (2023) “Double Reduction” Policy in Education Industry and Firm Values: Evidence from China. Finance Research Letters, vol. 54, June, Article no 103696. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2023.103696

Ding J., Zhang T. (2024) 双减”政策实践中教师的责任与担当 [Teachers' Responsibilities and Commitments in the Practice of the "Double Reduction" Policy]. 教学与管理 / Teaching and Management, vol. 12, pp. 52–55.

Donaldson T., Preston L.E. (1995) The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications. Academy of Management Review, vol. 20, no 1, pp. 65–91. https://doi.org/10.2307/258887

Hamid M.O., Khan A., Islam M.M. (2018) The Spread of Private Tutoring in English in Developing Societies: Exploring Students’ Perceptions. Discourse Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, vol. 39, no 6, pp. 868–886. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2017.1308314

Hou J.J., Pan L. (2023) Analysis on the Representation, Attribution and Coping Strategies of Educational Involution. Journal of Beijing City University, no 3, pp. 73–81. http://dx.doi.org/10.16132/j.cnki.cn11-5388/z.2023.03.013

Ji W.X. (2022) 韩国“双减”政策失败述评. 比较教育学报 [A Comment on the Failure of the “Double Reduction” Policy Pursued by South Korea]. Journal of Comparative Education, no 1, p. 41.

Jia W., Peng J. (2022) The Public Sentiment Analysis of Double Reduction Policy on Weibo Platform. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience: Cinclus. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/3212681

Jiang Y., Wang Y. (2021) Determinants and Possible Solutions of K12 Education Gap between Chinese Urban and Rural Areas. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Humanities Education and Social Sciences (Xishuangbanna, 2021, October 29–31), pp. 2508–2513.

Jin X., Sun Y. (2022) Does Double Reduction Policy Decrease Educational Pressures on Chinese Family? Advances in Social Science. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, vol. 637, pp. 771–776. http://dx.doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.220131.140

Langrafe T.F., Barakat S.R., Stocker F., Boaventura J.M. (2020) A Stakeholder Theory Approach to Creating Value in Higher Education Institutions. The Bottom Line Managing Library Finances, vol. 33, no 4, pp. 297–313. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/BL-03-2020-0021

Lee C.J., Lee H., Jang H.-M. (2010) The History of Policy Responses to Shadow Education in South Korea: Implications for the Next Cycle of Policy Responses. Asia Pacific Education Review, vol. 11, no 1, pp. 97–108. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12564-009-9064-6

Liu D., Morgan W.J., Zhang X., Wu W. (2024) Private Tutoring before and after the ‘Double-Reduction’ Policy in China: Choices and Rationale. SAGE Open, vol. 14, no 2. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241255864

Liu Y. (2022) The Impact of the ‘Double Reduction’ Policy on Front-Line Teachers and Suggestions for Improvement. Teaching and Management. Available at: http://www.shmbjy.org/item-detail.aspx? (accessed 28.08.2025).

Lu J., Tuo P., Pan J., Zhou M., Zhang M., Hu S. (2023) Shadow Education in China and Its Diversified Normative Governance Mechanism: Double Reduction Policy and Internet Public Opinion. Sustainability, vol. 15, iss. 2, Article no 1437. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15021437

Lu W., Zhou S., Wei Y. (2022) Government Policies and Unintended Consequences: Rising Demand for Private Supplementary Tutoring in China. International Journal of Educational Development, vol. 94, October, Article no 102653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2022.102653

Lucas P., Baird J., Arai L., Law C., Roberts H. (2007) Worked Examples of Alternative Methods for the Synthesis of Qualitative and Quantitative Research in Systematic Reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, vol. 15, no 7, Article no 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-7-4

Moher D., Liberati A., Tetzlaff J., Altman D.G. (2009) Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Med, vol. 21, no 6(7), Article no e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097

Muka T., Glisic M., Milic J., Verhog S., Bohlius J., Bramer W. et al. (2020) A 24-Step Guide on How to Design, Conduct, and Successfully Publish a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis in Medical Research. European Journal of Epidemiology, vol. 35, no 1, pp. 49–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-019-00576-5

Remington R. (2020) Quality Appraisal. A Step-by-Step Guide to Conducting an Integrative Review (eds C.E. Toronto, R. Remington), Cham: Springer International, pp. 45–55.

Reynolds S.J., Schultz F.C., Hekman D.R. (2006) Stakeholder Theory and Managerial Decision-Making: Constraints and Implications of Balancing Stakeholder Interests. Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 64, no 3, pp. 285–301. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-005-5493-2

Song N.Q., Yang X. (2014) A Quantitative Analysis of the Heavy Course Load of Chinese Primary and Secondary School Students. Educational Research, vol. 35, no 3, pp. 25–30.

Stevenson D.L., Baker D.P. (1992) Shadow Education and Allocation in Formal Schooling: Transition to University in Japan. American Journal of Sociology, vol. 97, no 6, pp. 1639–1657.

Stoner J.A.F., Freeman R.E. (1999) Administração. São Paulo: LTC.

Tian S., Yuan J. (2024) The Implementation of the "Double Reduction" Policy in Chinese Primary and Secondary Schools: An Analysis of the Policy Framework and Implementation Strategy. Eurasia Journal of Science and Technology, vol. 6, no 4, pp. 5–14. https://doi.org/10.61784/ejst3019

Wang D., Li H., Zhang X., Wang X., Qiu Y., Ma Z., Fan Y. (2024) Changes and Relevant Factors in Depressive and Anxiety Symptoms among Chinese Adolescents after the “Double Reduction” Policy: A Repeated Cross-Sectional Survey with a Nested Longitudinal Subsample. Journal of Affective Disorders, no 367, pp. 88–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2024.08.191

Wang L., Fan R. (2023) Research on the Impact and Countermeasures of the "Double Reduction" Policy from the Perspective of Teachers. Road to Success, vol. 24, pp. 57–60.

Wang Q., Luo X., Yang J. (2022) Understanding China’s Double Reduction Policy on Educational Economy. Global Economic Observer, vol. 10, no 1, pp. 63–69.

Xie J., Qian J. (2024) How to Optimize Homework Evaluation under the “Double Reduction” Policy? An Analysis Based on Teachers’ Attention Allocation. Frontiers of Education in China, vol. 19, no 3, pp. 271–289. https://doi.org/10.3868/s110-010-024-0015-7

Xue E., Li J. (2023) What Is the Value Essence of “Double Reduction” (Shuang Jian) Policy in China? A Policy Narrative Perspective. Educational Philosophy and Theory, vol. 55, no 7, pp. 787–796. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2022.2040481

Xue H., Shi H. (2022) 起跑线竞争:我国中小学生首次参与课外补习时间分析——支持“双减”政策落实的一项实证研究 [Competition at the Starting Line: Analysis of the First Participation Time in Extracurricular Tutoring among Chinese Primary and Middle School Students—An Empirical Study Supporting the Implementation of the "Double Reduction" Policy]. Journal of East China Normal University (Educational Sciences), vol. 55, no 2, pp. 71–85. https://doi.org/10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2022.02.006​

Yan Z. (2022) “双减”政策背景下中小学生电子游戏引导性研究 [Guiding Primary and Middle School Students’ Video Game Use under the “Double Reduction” Policy]. Journal of Lüliang University, vol. 12, no 1, pp. 86–92. Available at: https://example-journal-url​ (accessed 28.08.2025).

Yang L., Xie Y., Zhou A., Zhang W., Smith J. (2024) The Impact of the Implementation of ‘Double Reduction’ Policy on Tutors in Shadow Education: Legislation Goals and Early Experiences. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, vol. 54, no 7, pp. 1099–1115. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2023.2170173

Yang X., Wen Y. (2022) 双减”政策实施研究的现状、难点及未来之着力点 [The Current Situation, Difficulties, and Future Focus of Research on the Implementation of the "Double Reduction" Policy. 新疆师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)/ Journal of Xinjiang Normal University (Philosophy and Social Sciences), vol. 43, no 4, pp. 25–38.

Yu S., Zheng J., Xu Z., Zhang T. (2022) The Transformation of Parents’ Perception of Education Involution under the Background of “Double Reduction” Policy: The Mediating Role of Education Anxiety and Perception of Education Equity. Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 13, May, Article no 800039. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.800039

Yuan J. (2022) Research on the Relationship between Double Reduction Policy and Fertility Intention. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Mental Health, Education and Human Development (Dalian, China, 2022, 27–29 May), pp. 757–761.

Zhang W., Bray M. (2021) A Changing Environment of Urban Education: Historical and Spatial Analysis of Private Supplementary Tutoring in China. Environment and Urbanization, vol. 33, no 1, pp. 43–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0956247820981820

Zhang Y., Zhuang X., Liu W. (2021) The Dilemma of Supply and Demand behind the Burden Reduction of Students in Compulsory Education and Its Solution. Chinese Education Journal, vol. 20, no 9, pp. 23–29.

Zhang Z.Y. (2021) Reconstruction and Governance of the Public Education System under the “Double Reduction” Pattern. Journal of The Chinese Society of Education, no 9, pp. 20–26.

Zhao C.Y. (2024) A Critical Discourse Problematization Framework (CDPF) Analysis of “Double Reduction” Policy in China. Policy Futures in Education, vol. 22, no 7, pp. 1373–1386.

Zhong K., Park J. (2023) The Double Reduction Policy and Education Development in China. International Journal of Comparative Education and Development, vol. 25, no 3/4, pp. 137–152. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCED-09-2022-0063

Zhou C., Su Q., Wang Y. (2017) Research on the Heterogeneity of Children’s Education Investment in Rural Households under the Background of Rural Household Differentiation – Also on the Impact of Shadow Education on the Equalization of Educational Outcomes. Education and Economy, vol. 20, no 2, pp. 62–68.

Zhu H., Li G., Liang H. et al. (2023) 中小学教师工作强度调控要素及标准研究–基于全国 48874 名教师的调查分析 [Research on Factors and Standards of Regulating the Work Intensity of Primary and Secondary School Teachers—Based on the Analysis of 48,874 Teachers Nationwide. 中国教育学刊 / Chinese Journal of Education, vol. 12, pp. 36–43.

Опубликован
2025-10-22
Как цитировать
Shcheglova, Irina, Jiaqi Fu, Xianglin Zhang, Ye Zhang, WangYuqing, Rui Yin, и Xiao Zhong. 2025. «Double Reduction Policy in Chinese Education: Promises, Outcomes, Perspectives». Вопросы образования / Educational Studies Moscow, вып. 3 (октябрь). https://doi.org/10.17323/vo-2025-23946.
Выпуск
Раздел
Исследовательские статьи