Typology of Architectures of Flexible Higher Education Curriculum

Keywords: individual educational trajectories, ILP, flexible educational programs, flexible curriculum, individualization

Abstract

The article describes the diversity of approaches to the structure of flexible curricula in the world universities. Based on the analysis of educational programs of 66 universities from 13 countries, the typology of flexible curriculum architectures centered on students’ choice opportunities is proposed for the first time. Data on the architecture of educational programs of universities were taken from open sources - university websites, scientific publications on the development of new curricula and published curricula. The proposed typology is built on two bases: program selection and courses selection. A comparative analysis of curricula with different types of architectures was conducted. It is concluded that leading world universities strive to provide the most flexible curricula. The developed typology can be used both for future research as a reference scale for comparison and by managers when developing new curricula.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abramova M.O., Barannikov K.A., Gruzdev I.A., Zhikharev D.A., Leshukov O.V., Ott A.M. et al. (2021) Quality of Education in Russian Universities: What We Realised in the Pandemic. Analytical Report. Tomsk: Tomsk State University (In Russian).

Alexander S. (2010) Flexible Learning in Higher Education. International Encyclopedia of Education (eds P. Peterson, E. Baker, B. McGaw), New York, NY: Elsevier, pp. 441–447. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-044894-7.00868-X

Aleksandrova N.V., Ivanova N.A., Kalashnikov N.P., Matronchik A. Yu., Olchak A.S., Samarchenko D. A. et al. (2022) First Results of Implementation of Individual Educational Trajectories in the Course of General Physics at National Research Nuclear University MEPhI. Physics in Higher Education, vol. 28, no 3, pp. 5–13 (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.54965/16093143_2022_28_3_5

Arifulina R.U., Katushenko O.A. (2021) Analysis of Domestic and Foreign Trends of Individualisation of Educational Process in Higher Education: Analytical Report. Vestnik of Minin University, vol. 9, no 4, Article no 2 (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.26795/2307-1281-2021-9-4-2

Ash M.G. (2006) Bachelor of What, Master of Whom? The Humboldt Myth and Historical Transformations of Higher Education in German‐Speaking Europe and the US. European Journal of Education, vol. 41, no 2, pp. 245–267. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-3435.2006.00258.x

Barnett R. (2020) Towards the Creative University: Five Forms of Creativity and Beyond. Higher Education Quarterly, vol. 74, no 1, pp. 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.12231

Callender C., Dougherty K.J. (2018) Student Choice in Higher Education—Reducing or Reproducing Social Inequalities? Social Sciences, vol. 7, no 10, Article no 189. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci7100189

Carpenter H.C. (1951) Emerson, Eliot, and the Elective System. The New England Quarterly, vol. 24, no 1, pp. 13–34. https://doi.org/10.2307/361254

Christopher D., Harte K., George C. (2002) The Implementation of Tomorrow’s Doctors. Medical Education, vol. 36, iss. 3, pp. 282–288. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2923.2002.01152.x

Dekker T. (2020) The Value of Curricular Choice through Student Eyes. The Curriculum Journal, vol. 32, iss. 2, pp. 198–214. https://doi.org/10.1002/curj.71

Del Rossi A.F., Hersch J. (2016) The Private and Social Benefits of Double Majors. Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, vol. 7, no 2, pp. 292–325. https://doi.org/10.1017/bca.2016.14

Del Rossi A.F., Hersch J. (2008) Double Your Major, Double Your Return? Economics of Education Review, vol. 27, no 4, pp. 375–386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2007.03.001

Denice P.A. (2021) Choosing and Changing Course: Postsecondary Students and the Process of Selecting a Major Field of Study. Sociological Perspectives, vol. 64, no 1, pp. 82–108. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731121420921903

Eliot C.W. (1885) The Elective System. Higher Education Resource Hub! Available at: https://higher-ed.org/resources/charles_eliot/ (accessed 04 August 2024).

Elliott R.W., Paton V.O. (2018) U.S. Higher Education Reform: Origins and Impact of Student Curricular Choice. International Journal of Educational Development, vol. 61, July, pp. 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2017.11.008

Foster N.A. (2017) Change of Academic Major: The Influence of Broad and Narrow Personality Traits. College Student Journal, no 51, pp. 363–379.

Gabay-Egozi L., Shavit Y., Yaish M. (2010) Curricular Choice: A Test of a Rational Choice Model of Education. European Sociological Review, vol. 26, no 4, pp. 447–463. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcp031

Goger A., Parco A., Vegas E. (2022) Learning and Working in the Digital Age: Advancing Opportunities and Identifying the Risks. Available at: https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/Learning-and-working-in-the-digital-age_FINAL.pdf (accessed 13.01.2026)

Goulart V.G., Liboni L.B., Cezarino L.O. (2021) Balancing Skills in the Digital Transformation Era: The Future of Jobs and the Role of Higher Education. Industry and Higher Education, vol. 36, no 2, pp. 118–127. https://doi.org/10.1177/09504222211029796

Hemelt S.W. (2010) The College Double Major and Subsequent Earnings. Education Economics, vol. 18, no 2, pp. 167–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/09645290802469931

Hora M.T., Benbow R.J., Smolarek B.B. (2018) Re-Thinking Soft Skills and Student Employability: A New Paradigm for Undergraduate Education. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, vol. 50, no 6, pp. 30–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/00091383.2018.1540819

Jones E., Ratcliff J. (1991) Which General Education Curriculum Is Better: Core Curriculum or the Distributional Requirement? The Journal of General Education, vol. 40, pp. 69–101.

Jones R., Higgs R., de Angelis C., Prideaux D. (2001) Changing Face of Medical Curricula. The Lancet, no 357 (9257), pp. 699–703. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(00)04134-9

Kirkpatrick D. (2001) Staff Development for Flexible Learning. International Journal for Academic Development, vol. 6, no 2, pp. 168–176. https://doi.org/10.1080/713769268

Klimova T.A., Kim A.T., Ott M.A. (2023) Students’ Individual Educational Trajectories as a Condition for High-Quality University Education. University Management: Practice and Analysis, vol. 27, no 1, pp. 23–33 (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.15826/umpa.2023.01.003

Klyuev A.K., Tomilin O.B., Fadeeva I.M., Tomilin O.O. (2018) University Management: Transformation Scenarios. University Management: Practice and Analysis, vol. 22, no 1, pp. 93–104 (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.15826/umpa.2018.01.009

Lang D., Wang A., Dalal N., Paepcke A., Stevens M.L. (2022) Forecasting Undergraduate Majors: A Natural Language Approach. AERA Open, vol. 8, Article no 233285842211265. https://doi.org/10.1177/23328584221126516

Law M.Y. (2022) A Review of Curriculum Change and Innovation for Higher Education. Journal of Education and Training Studies, vol. 10, no 2, pp. 16–23. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v10i2.5448

Lee H.R., von Keyserlingk L., Arum R., Eccles J.S. (2021) Why Do They Enroll in This Course? Undergraduates’ Course Choice from a Motivational Perspective. Frontiers in Education, no 6, Article no 641254. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.641254

Liu V., Mishra S., Kopko E.M. (2021) Major Decision: The Impact of Major Switching on Academic Outcomes in Community Colleges. Research in Higher Education, vol. 62, no 4, pp. 498–527. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-020-09608-6

Malgwi C.A., Howe M.A., Burnaby P.A. (2005) Influences on Students’ Choice of College Major. Journal of Education for Business, vol. 80, no 5, pp. 275–282. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOEB.80.5.275-282

Martin M., Furiv U. (eds) (2022) SDG-4: Flexible Learning Pathways in Higher Education – from Policy to Practice: An International Comparative Analysis. Paris: UNESCO International Institute for Educational Planning. https://doi.org/10.54675/IRXZ6771

McGarry B.J., Theobald K., Lewis P.A., Coyer F. (2015) Flexible Learning Design in Curriculum Delivery Promotes Student Engagement and Develops Metacognitive Learners: An Integrated Review. Nurse Education Today, vol. 35, no 9, pp. 966–973. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2015.06.009

Morris P., Castro-Faix M., Hengtgen K., Rapp K., Winkler C., Xu T. (2023) Virtues of Academic Exploration: Impact of Major Changes on Degree Completion. Journal of College Orientation, Transition, and Retention, vol. 30, no 1. https://doi.org/10.24926/jcotr.v30i1.4904

Murphy M., Seneviratne R., Mcaleer S., Remers O., Davis M. (2008) Student Selected Components: Do Students Learn What Teachers Think They Teach? Medical Teacher, vol. 30, no 9–10, pp. e175–e179. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590802337138

Normand C., Littlejohn A., Falconer I. (2008) A Model for Effective Implementation of Flexible Programme Delivery. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, vol. 45, no 1, pp. 25–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703290701757351

O’Neill G., Mcmahon T. (2005) Student-Centred Learning: What does it mean for students and lecturers? Emerging Issues in the Practice of University Learning and Teaching (eds G. O’Neill, S. Moore, B. McMullin), Dublin: AISHE, pp. 31–39.

Richardson J. (2009) Factors that Influence First Year Medical Students’ Choice of Student Selected Component. Medical Teacher, vol. 31, no 9, pp. e418–e424. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590902744878

Riley S., Ferrell W., Gibbs T., Murphy M., Cairns W., Smith W. (2008) Twelve Tips for Developing and Sustaining a Programme of Student Selected Components. Medical Teacher, vol. 30, no 4, pp. 370–376. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590801965145

Riley S., Gibbs T., Ferrell W., Nelson P., Smith W., Murphy M. (2009) Getting the Most Out of Student Selected Components: 12 Tips for Participating Students. Medical Teacher, vol. 31, no 10, pp. 895–902. https://doi.org/10.3109/01421590903175361

Ringenberg W.C. (2016) Student Academic Freedom. The Christian College and the Meaning of Academic Freedom. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 107–114. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137398338_17

Robinson K.J. (2011) The Rise of Choice in the U.S. University and College: 1910–2005. Sociological Forum, vol. 26, no 3, pp. 601–622. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1573-7861.2011.01264.x

Rubin P., Franchi-Christopher D. (2002) New Edition of Tomorrow’s Doctors. Medical Teacher, vol. 24, no 4, pp. 368–369. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159021000000816

Sazonov B.A. (2020) Organisation of the Educational Process: Opportunities for Individualisation of Learning. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii / Higher Education in Russia, vol. 29, no 6, pp. 35–50 (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2019-29-6-35-50

Scott J.C. (2006) The Mission of the University: Medieval to Postmodern Transformations. The Journal of Higher Education, vol. 77, no 1, pp. 1–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2006.11778917

Shemanaeva M.A. (2017) On Interpretations of the Term "Individual Educational Trajectory". Koncept, no S12, http://e-koncept. ru/2017/470154. Htm (In Russian)

Smolarchuk K. (2015) Student Choice: The Effects on Motivation and Student Academic Achievement (Master of Education Thesis). Victoria, Canada: University of Victoria. Available at: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Student-Choice%3A-the-effects-on-motivation-and-Smolarchuk/7fe50fb14ac9c94a0ea104ff4879a0798f0e795e

UNESCO (2022) Beyond Limits. New Ways to Reinvent Higher Education. Working document for the World Higher Education Conference (Barcelona, 2022, 18–20 May). Available at: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000389912 (accessed 13.01.2026)

Van Rooij E., Jansen E.P.W.A., van de Grift W. (2017) First-Year University Students’ Academic Success: The Importance of Academic Adjustment. European Journal of Psychology of Education, vol. 33, October, pp. 749–767. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-017-0347-8

Von Mizener B.H., Williams R.L. (2009) The Effects of Student Choices on Academic Performance. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, vol. 11, no 2, pp. 110–128. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098300708323372

Wang X. (2013) Why Students Choose STEM Majors: Motivation, High School Learning, and Postsecondary Context of Support. American Educational Research Journal, vol. 50, no 5, pp. 1081–1121. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831213488622

Zhu Q., Zhang L. (2021) Effects of a Double Major on Post-Baccalaureate Outcomes. Education Finance and Policy, vol. 16, no 1, pp. 146–169. https://doi.org/10.1162/edfp_a_00290

Published
2026-03-22
How to Cite
MuzykaPavel A., and FruminIsak D. 2026. “Typology of Architectures of Flexible Higher Education Curriculum ”. Voprosy Obrazovaniya / Educational Studies Moscow, no. 1 (March). https://doi.org/10.17323/vo-2026-22157.
Section
Research Articles