Keywords
circular economy
firm efficiency
product eco-innovation
process eco-innovation
organizational eco-innovation
sustainability
more innovative companies
less innovative companies
Slovenia
How to Cite
Abstract
Eco-innovation plays an increasingly important role for the competitiveness of companies. They open up new market opportunities due to the growing demand for eco-friendly products and can increase business efficiency. Using a dynamic capabilities lens, this article analyzes the relationships between various types of eco-innovation (product, process and organizational) and firm efficiency in the context of less innovative and more innovative companies. We use data from an online survey of Slovenian companies that have implemented eco-innovations as part of their operations. Statistical tests include an analysis of variance and a linear regression analysis.
We find that organizational eco-innovation positively affects firm efficiency at all companies independent of their innovation potential, while process eco-innovation is positively associated with firm efficiency only among more innovative companies. In addition, at less innovative companies, firm age positively affects firm efficiency, suggesting that older and less innovative companies may enjoy learning curve benefits derived from experience. However, firm size has a positive effect on firm efficiency at more innovative companies, suggesting that more innovative companies may benefit from economies of scale. In general, more innovative companies are more likely to engage in eco-innovation and more likely to derive cost benefits (efficiency) from different types of eco-innovation.
The main limitations of our analysis are the subjective data on the level of firms’ innovation and efficiency, the cross-sectional study design, and the single-country setting. Further in-depth longitudinal studies could better model the direction of causality between the implementation of eco-innovation and business efficiency, obtain objective data on business innovation, and ensure a more detailed and nuanced exploration of dynamic firm capabilities.
References
Adalikwu C. (2011) Impact of international and home-based research and development (R&D) on innovation performance // International Journal of Human Sciences. Vol. 8. № 2. P. 474-498.
Agan Y., Acar M.F., Borodin A. (2013) Drivers of environmental processes and their impact on performance: A study of Turkish SMEs // Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 51. P. 23-33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.12.043
Ambec S., Lanoie P. (2008) Does It Pay to Be Green? A Systematic Overview // The Academy of Management Perspectives. Vol. 22. № 4. Р. 45-62.
Barney J. (1991) Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage // Journal of Management. Vol. 17. № 1. Р. 99-120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
Belin J., Horbach J., Oltra V. (2011) Determinants and Specificities of Eco-innovations - An Econometric Analysis for the French and German Industry Based on the Community Innovation Survey. GREThA Discussion Paper 2011-17. Bordeaux: Université Montesquieu Bordeaux IV. Режим доступа: http://ideas.repec.org/p/grt/wpegrt/2011-17.html, дата обращения 26.06.2013.
Bourguignon D. (2016) Closing the loop: New circular economy package. Brussels: European Parliament.
Chen Y.-S. (2008) The Driver of Green Innovation and Green Image - Green Core Competence // Journal of Business Ethics. Vol. 81. № 3. P. 531-543.
Chen Y.-S. (2013) Towards green trust: The influences of green perceived quality, green perceived risk, and green satisfaction // Management Decision. Vol. 51. № 1. Р. 63-82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/00251741311291319
Chen Y.-S., Lai S.-B., Wen C.-T. (2006) The Influence of Green Innovation Performance on Corporate Advantage in Taiwan // Journal of Business Ethics. Vol. 67. № 4. Р. 331-339.
Cheng C.C., Shiu E.C. (2012) Validation of a proposed instrument for measuring eco-innovation: An implementation perspective // Technovation. Vol. 32. № 6. Р. 329-344. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2012.02.001
Chiou T.-Y., Chan H.K., Lettice F., Chung S.H. (2011) The influence of greening the suppliers and green innovation on environmental performance and competitive advantage in Taiwan // Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review. Vol. 47. № 6. Р. 822-836. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2011.05.016
Dutta S., Lanvin B., Wunsch-Vincent S. (eds.) (2016) The Global Innovation Index 2016. Winning with Global Innovation, Cornell University, INSEAD, World Intellectual Property Organisation. Режим доступа: http://www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/wipo_pub_gii_2016.pdf, дата обращения 16.05.2017.
EASAC (2015) Circular economy: A commentary from the perspectives of the natural and social sciences. Brussels: European Academies’ Science Advisory Council.
Eisenhardt K.M., Martin J.A. (2000) Dynamic Capabilities: What Are They? // Strategic Management Journal. Vol. 21. № 10-11. Р. 1105-1121.
European Commission (2012) Eco-Innovation Observatory. Methodological Report. Brussels: European Commission. Режим доступа: http://www.eco-innovation.eu/images/stories/Reports/eio_methodological_report_2012.pdf, дата обращения 26.06.2014.
GEM (2016) Global Entrepreneurship Monitor 2015/16 Global Report. London: Global Entrepreneurship Research Association.
Ghisellini P., Cialani C., Ulgiati S. (2016) A review on circular economy: The expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems // Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 114. P. 11-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007
Govindan K., Diabat A. Madan Shankar K. (2014) Analyzing the drivers of green manufacturing with fuzzy approach // Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 96. № 1. Р. 182-193. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.02.054
Hojnik J., Ruzzier M. (2016a) What drives eco-innovation? A review of an emerging literature // Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions. Vol. 19. P. 31-41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2015.09.006
Hojnik J., Ruzzier M. (2016b) The driving forces of process eco-innovation and its impact on performance: Insights from Slovenia // Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 133. P. 812-825. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.002
Horbach J. (2008) Determinants of environmental innovation - New evidence from German panel data sources // Research Policy. Vol. 37. № 1. P. 163-173. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.08.006
Horbach J., Rammer C., Rennings K. (2012) Determinants of eco-innovations by type of environmental impact - The role of regulatory push/pull, technology push and market pull // Ecological Economics. Vol. 78. P. 112-122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.04.005
Kammerer D. (2009) The effects of customer benefit and regulation on environmental product innovation // Ecological Economics. Vol. 68. № 8-9. Р. 2285-2295. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.02.016
Kesidou E., Demirel P. (2012) On the drivers of eco-innovations: Empirical evidence from the UK // Research Policy. Vol. 41. № 5. P. 862-870. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.01.005
Klewitz J. (2012) Intermediaries driving eco-innovation in SMEs: A qualitative investigation // European Journal of Innovation Management. Vol. 15. № 4. Р. 442-467. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/14601061211272376
Li D., Liu J. (2014) Dynamic capabilities, environmental dynamism, and competitive advantage: Evidence from China // Journal of Business Research. Vol. 67. № 1. Р. 2793-2799. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.08.007
Li Y. (2014) Environmental innovation practices and performance: Moderating effect of resource commitment // Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 66. P. 450-458. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.11.044
Makkonen H., Pohjola M., Olkkonen R., Koponen A. (2014) Dynamic capabilities and firm performance in a financial crisis // Journal of Business Research. Vol. 67. № 1. Р. 2707-2719. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.03.020
Montabon F., Sroufe R., Narasimhan R. (2007) An examination of corporate reporting, environmental management practices and firm performance // Journal of Operations Management. Vol. 25. № 5. Р. 998-1014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2006.10.003
Nelson R.R., Winter S.G. (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Ness D. (2008) Sustainable urban infrastructure in China: Towards a factor 10 improvement in resource productivity through integrated infrastructure system // International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology. Vol. 15. № 4. Р. 288-301.
O'Brien R.M. (2007) A caution regarding rules of thumb for variance inflation factors // Quality and Quantity. Vol. 41. № 5. P. 673-690. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-006-9018-6
Piening E.P., Salge T.O. (2015) Understanding the Antecedents, Contingencies, and Performance Implications of Process Innovation: A Dynamic Capabilities Perspective // Journal of Product Innovation Management. Vol. 32. № 1. P. 80-97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12225
Sarkar A.N. (2013) Promotion of eco-innovation to leverage sustainable development of eco-industry and green growth // International Journal of Ecology and Development. Vol. 25. № 2. Р. 71-104. Режим доступа: http://www.ecsdev.org/ojs/index.php/ejsd/article/view/48, дата обращения 12.06.2017.
Sharma S., Vredenburg H. (1998) Proactive corporate environmental strategy and the development of competitively valuable organizational capabilities // Strategic Management Journal. Vol. 19. P. 729-753.
Shrivastava P. (1995) Environmental technologies and competitive advantage // Strategic Management Journal. Vol. 16. № S1. P. 183-200. Режим доступа: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi//abstract, дата обращения 23.02.2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250160923
Su B., Heshmati A., Geng Y., Yu X. (2013) A review of the circular economy in China: Moving from rethoric to implementation // Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 42. P. 215-277.
Teece D.J. (1981) The market for know-how and the efficient international transfer of technology // Annals of the Academy of Political and Social Science. Vol. 458. P. 81-96.
Teece D.J., Pisano G., Shuen A. (1997) Dynamic capabilities and strategic management // Strategic Management Journal. Vol. 18. № 7. Р. 509-533. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812834478_0002
Triguero A., Moreno-Mondéjar L., Davia M.A. (2013) Drivers of different types of eco-innovation in European SMEs // Ecological Economics. Vol. 92. P. 25-33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.04.009
WEF (2016) Stages of development and the weighted index. Режим доступа: http://reports.weforum.org/global-competitiveness-report-2014-2015/methodology, дата обращения 17.01.2017.
Wernerfelt B. (1984) A resource-based view of the firm // Strategic Management Journal. Vol. 5. № 2. Р. 171-180.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.